Is the Medium the Message? A Study of the Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Characteristics on Attitude Change¹

Abstract

The present study examined the interactive effects of type of media, communicator, and position of message on persuasiveness of the communication. Subjects received a communication over television, radio (audio tape), or written medium, which either agreed with a position they held or strongly disagreed with it. The communicator was either a newscaster or a candidate for political office. The results indicated that subjects felt the newscaster to be more trustworthy than the candidate. In line with previous research, there was no main effect of media on persuasiveness. However, media interacted with the other variables so that when the communication disagreed with the audience, television was the most persuasive medium with the newscaster but the least persuasive with the untrusted candidate. There was no effect for media when the message agreed with the audience. Further, the candidate taking a position congruent with the audience's was rated as more attractive but less trustworthy than a candidate taking the opposite position. It was suggested that television may be the most involving medium and that either a counterargument theory or reactance theory could explain why it was not effective with the candidate.Research on attitude change has generally been separated into four categories: source factors, message factors, receiver factors, and channel factors (cf. McGuire, 1969). Although there have been numerous theories and studies concerned with source, message, and audience factors, "the question of comparative effectiveness of media has attracted practically no basic research

Communication Modality and Biased Processing: A Study on the Occasion of the German 2002 Election TV Debate

“…Largely consistent with this assumption, Andreoli and Worchel (1978; see also Worchel, Andreoli, & Eason, 1975) found that sources who were perceived as rather trustworthy (sources introduced either as a newscaster or as a former representative) produced greater attitude change on television than in a newspaper story, whereas a source perceived as rather untrustworthy (a political candidate) produced greater attitude change in a newspaper story than on television.…”

Computational Analysis of Persuasiveness in Social Multimedia

“…In particular, Chaiken et al [5] showed different influences on persuasion and comprehension when a message was delivered through the written, audiotaped or videotaped modality. Worchel et al [42] also studied the effects on persuasion with different types of media, communicators, and positions of the message.…”

The Role of Culture in Health Communication

“…For example, studies have generally found that compared to other media, video tends to shift attention to source characteristics. It elicits more thoughts about (93) and positive perceptions of the source (74), is better able to carry nonverbal messages (27), and seems to be most effective with sources who are likable (15) or trustworthy (1,112). In a 1993 meta-analysis, video ranked behind only face-to-face communication for the largest source effects attributable to message media (110).…”

“…Effects of source expertise and trustworthiness are often context dependent (94). For example, they may vary based on characteristics of the message, the receiver, the channel though which persuasion occurs, as well as combinations of these factors (1,2,7,15,16,21,31,112). Sources that are liked, or judged to be socially attractive, are also more persuasive than others (5,84), particularly when the communication channel is video or audio (15) or when the message being communicated is not desirable (20).…”