2021
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the left right? The creeping embourgeoisement of social democracy through homeownership

Abstract: Recent decades have been marked by the rise of populism, the emergence of New Labour and decline of social democratic parties. The dominant explanation for these trends is a shift in cultural attitudes but leaves open where such a sudden shift comes from. Advancing recent cross-sectional work on the political economy of housing, this paper suggests that slow-moving underlying processes as materialized in the expansion of homeownership can help explain the observable cultural shift and recent macrotrends. Takin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the rental market is well regulated, one might expect, homeownership policies might be needed less. To the extent that voters of traditional left-wing parties underwent processes of embourgeoisement with ever higher participation in higher-income groups, education, and homeownership (Häusermann 2018;Hadziabdic and Kohl 2021), parties of the left may thus have also become a major driver of homeownership-favouring measures. Homeowners usually do not form additional organised groups beyond political parties to defend their interests, while tenant organisation, though existent, face recurrent problems of collective actions and are not as politically important as unions in labour and welfare politics.…”
Section: Explaining Homeowner Supporting Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the rental market is well regulated, one might expect, homeownership policies might be needed less. To the extent that voters of traditional left-wing parties underwent processes of embourgeoisement with ever higher participation in higher-income groups, education, and homeownership (Häusermann 2018;Hadziabdic and Kohl 2021), parties of the left may thus have also become a major driver of homeownership-favouring measures. Homeowners usually do not form additional organised groups beyond political parties to defend their interests, while tenant organisation, though existent, face recurrent problems of collective actions and are not as politically important as unions in labour and welfare politics.…”
Section: Explaining Homeowner Supporting Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the study of financialization (Van der Zwan, 2014), the sociology of insurance is very much unknown and certainly dwarfed by the sociology of risk and welfare. While there have been studies on the attitudinal and political consequences of other forms of private wealth—most notably housing assets (André et al., 2018; Ansell, 2019; Hadziabdic & Kohl, 2021) and total private wealth (Nadeau et al., 2011)—the effects of life insurance assets are widely overlooked.…”
Section: Introduction: the Unknown World Of Private Economic Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, homeownership is recognised within electoral geography for changing the way in which class interests (and conflicts) feature (or not) within politics. Left-wing parties increasingly promote homeownership, while right-wing parties garner support as rising asset prices create a wealth effect that reduces reliance on, and preference for, the welfare state (Hadziabdic and Kohl, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%