Is the Interspinous Device (Coflex) Outdated in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis? A Seven-Year Follow-up

Yin, Dong; Zheng, Xiujun; Gu, Heng; Liang, Guoyan; Zhuang, Jianxiong; Cx, Liang; B, Liu; Chang, Yueliang

doi:10.21767/2471-8173.100042

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, a larger preoperative ROM of the implanted segment indicated that adjacent segments need to compensate more. Previous biomechanical and clinical studies have explained the compensatory loading transfer (33) and increased ROM (34)(35)(36) at adjacent levels after rigid fixation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A minimum 8-year follow-up comparative study of decompression and coflex stabilization with decompression and fusion

Zheng

Zhuang

et al. 2021

Exp Ther Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study aimed to compare the outcomes of decompression and interlaminar stabilisation with those of decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) at a minimum 8-year follow-up. The current study also aimed to analyse the risk factors of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A total of 82 consecutive patients with LDD who underwent surgery between June 2007 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 39 underwent decompression and Coflex interspinous stabilisation (Coflex group) and 43 underwent decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (PLIF group). All patients had a minimum of 8-years of follow-up data. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups, and the risk factors of developing radiographic ASD were also evaluated. The Oswestry disability index and visual analogue scale leg and back pain scores of both groups significantly improved compared with the baseline (all P<0.05), and no difference were indicated between the two groups at each follow-up time point (P>0.05). The Coflex group exhibited preserved mobility (P<0.001), which was associated with a decreased amount of blood loss (P<0.001), shorter duration of surgery (P=0.001), shorter duration of hospital stay and a lower incidence of ASD (12.8 vs. 32.56%; P= 0.040) compared with the fusion group.The current study indicated that coflex and fusion technologies are safe and effective for the treatment of LDD, based on long-term follow-up data. However, Coflex interspinous stabilisation was revealed to reduce ASD incidence. Under strict indications, Coflex interspinous stabilisation is an effective and safe treatment method.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%