2007
DOI: 10.1002/macp.200700100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Friedman Method Applicable to Transformations with Temperature Dependent Reaction Heat?

Abstract: In the case of chemical reactions with temperature dependent reaction heat, differences in the activation energy values are obtained using the Friedman (FR) and the advanced non‐linear (NLN) isoconversional methods. The FR method leads to systematic errors when the reaction heat significantly changes with the heating rate (from 7 to 16%), while the advanced NLN isoconversional method that uses integrated values is not subject to these systematic errors. An explanation of this is given. For long time prediction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
84
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, f(α) can be considered constant and taking natural logarithms at both sides of Eq. (7) gives the following equation [12,27]:…”
Section: Friedman Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, f(α) can be considered constant and taking natural logarithms at both sides of Eq. (7) gives the following equation [12,27]:…”
Section: Friedman Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the causes for these differences between the integral and differential methods are due to their intrinsic nature [51][52][53][54]. The approximations of temperature integral are obtained under the assumption that the activation energy does not depend on the degree of conversion.…”
Section: Model Free Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A homemade kinetic software regularly upgraded was used to compute the kinetic parameters from MFit-DIF, MFit-INT, MFree-DIF and MFree-INT methods [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Isoconversional Integral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%