“…Figures were considered above standard when higher than the 97.5th centile, and below standard when lower than the 2.5th centile (outside the normal range mean AE 1.96 SD). Fifty patients from the literature with the diagnosis of RS and a detailed clinical description were also included in the study; 24 (14 males and 10 females) with RRS and 26 (16 males and 10 females) with DRS [Robinow et al, 1969;Vera-Roman, 1973;Wadlington et al, 1973;Kelly et al, 1975;Wadia et al, 1978;Portnoy, 1979;Petit et al, 1980;Shprintzen et al, 1982;Menon et al, 1983;Bain et al, 1986;Bhandari et al, 1988;Nájera-Martinez et al, 1988;Vila-Coro et al, 1988;Glaser et al, 1989;Kumar and Puri, 1989;Schönau et al, 1990;Webber et al, 1990;Wiens et al, 1990;Schorderet et al, 1992;López et al, 1996;Aksit et al, 1997;Guuillén-Navarro et al, 1997;Al-Ata et al, 1998;Balci et al, 1998;Soliman et al, 1998;Kantaputra et al, 1999;Criado et al, 2000;Kulkarni and Reddy, 2004]. The combined (personal þ literaliterature) sample consisted therefore of 88 patients, 37 with RRS and 51 with DRS.…”