2016
DOI: 10.1080/1743727x.2016.1170476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the educational ‘what works’ agenda working? Critical methodological developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also served to (re)inforce a narrow understanding of what counts as valuable educational outcomes. This has led to a government preoccupation with identifying tightly defined, replicable interventions, that 'work' to improve attainment outcomes rapidly and at scale [20].…”
Section: The English Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also served to (re)inforce a narrow understanding of what counts as valuable educational outcomes. This has led to a government preoccupation with identifying tightly defined, replicable interventions, that 'work' to improve attainment outcomes rapidly and at scale [20].…”
Section: The English Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a series of career moves, by the 1980s, she connected with the Brookline Teacher Researcher Seminar (BTRS). A group founded by, for, and of teachers, BTRS focused on promoting open dialogue about "what wasn't working" in members' classrooms, a stark contrast from the dubious What Works Clearinghouse associated with accountabilityera education (Lynch & Martin, 2017;Pampaka et al, 2016).…”
Section: Cindy Ballenger: "A Teacher Out Of the '60s"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this second part of this double special issue, we continue to investigate the 'What works' agenda, challenging methods and developing a debate around how best to research, and revealing implications for policy and practice. In the first part (Pampaka, Williams, and Homer 2016), we focussed on what might be considered relatively 'orthodox' 'what works' approaches, with the dominant theme being impact evaluations and educational randomized control trials (RCTs), along with systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Another theme was that of effective communication and dissemination in order to reach maximum impact with the relevant stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%