2010
DOI: 10.2337/db09-1899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Diminished Incretin Effect in Type 2 Diabetes Just an Epi-Phenomenon of Impaired β-Cell Function?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
132
3
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
11
132
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Stimulation with the non-glucose beta cell stimulus arginine illustrates that a first-phase insulin response could still be produced if another intracellular beta cell pathway than that used by GLP-1 and GIP is stimulated. Importantly, the arginine response was unaffected by dexamethasone, indicating that the diminished incretin action of the two hormones is not related to a global dysfunction of the beta cells [12]. Rather, our results indicate that the impaired insulinotropic effects of GLP-1 and GIP represent a very early, specific beta cell defect, which can explain the impaired incretin effect in, for instance, obese individuals with insulin resistance [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stimulation with the non-glucose beta cell stimulus arginine illustrates that a first-phase insulin response could still be produced if another intracellular beta cell pathway than that used by GLP-1 and GIP is stimulated. Importantly, the arginine response was unaffected by dexamethasone, indicating that the diminished incretin action of the two hormones is not related to a global dysfunction of the beta cells [12]. Rather, our results indicate that the impaired insulinotropic effects of GLP-1 and GIP represent a very early, specific beta cell defect, which can explain the impaired incretin effect in, for instance, obese individuals with insulin resistance [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It has recently been argued that the loss of incretin effect seen in type 2 diabetes is due to a globally reduced capacity of the beta cells to secrete insulin so that the release of incretin hormones during oral stimulation cannot further increase insulin secretion, leading to an 'apparent' loss of incretin effect [12]. We therefore also investigated whether the glucocorticoid-induced reduction in the incretin effect was associated with a reduced maximal secretory response of the beta cells to arginine, a non-glucose, non-incretin beta cell stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Several lines of evidence support that the loss of incretin effect is secondary to development of diabetes. [19][20][21][22] However, more recent findings suggest that the loss of incretin effects in T2DM patients can only be explained by a specific loss of insulinotropic activity of the incretin hormones at physiological level. 19,2325 In overt T2DM, the consequence of the impaired incretin effect is that the ability of the patients to efficiently dispose of orally as opposed to intravenously administered glucose is completely lost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been argued [45] that the maximal secretory capacity of the beta cells is reached during the IVGTT of isoglycaemic challenges for the study of incretin effect in type 2 diabetes, meaning that the incretin hormones cannot further increase insulin secretion on oral stimulation, which could explain the apparent loss of the incretin effect. However, in our participants with NGT, this is unlikely to be the cause of the reduced incretin effect, particularly as the beta cell response to the mixed meal was significantly greater than to i.v.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%