2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Conventional Pore Water Pressure Concept Adequate for Fine-Grained Soils in Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the spatially constant negative capillary pressure (tension), the nonlinearly decaying feature of SSP also determines the local variation in pore water pressure along the direction perpendicular to the soil particle surface (i.e., the distance x shown in Figure 10). The compressive water pressure in the first two adsorptive layers can be as high as ∼1.6 GPa (e.g., Lu et al., 2021). This abnormally high water pressure will decrease quickly and nonlinearly away from the soil particle surface to the tensile pressure in capillary water (Lu & Zhang, 2019), partially compensating the spatial difference in SSP and maintaining the same matric potential everywhere within the soil–water–air REV.…”
Section: Implications Of Soil Water Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the spatially constant negative capillary pressure (tension), the nonlinearly decaying feature of SSP also determines the local variation in pore water pressure along the direction perpendicular to the soil particle surface (i.e., the distance x shown in Figure 10). The compressive water pressure in the first two adsorptive layers can be as high as ∼1.6 GPa (e.g., Lu et al., 2021). This abnormally high water pressure will decrease quickly and nonlinearly away from the soil particle surface to the tensile pressure in capillary water (Lu & Zhang, 2019), partially compensating the spatial difference in SSP and maintaining the same matric potential everywhere within the soil–water–air REV.…”
Section: Implications Of Soil Water Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care should be taken to not mistake the negative algebraic term with its real mechanism as it is the pore pressure in excess of a steady-state flow condition in soil in the vicinity of PVDs under vacuum preloading. (Lu, Likos et al 2021) has discussed in detail the inefficiency of common definition of pore pressure in soil mechanic and emphasized the necessity for developing better theories and seeking better engineering solutions for problems in geotechnical engineering.…”
Section: Introduction Bbbb Bbbsfsfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freezing of water to form ice is one of the most common phase transformations in the natural environment (Wettlaufer, 1999). Nearly one-third of the land surface of the Earth experiences freezing and thawing annually (Lu et al, 2021). In these permafrost and seasonally frozen regions, unfrozen water and pore ice coexist within a frozen soil, due to the complex soil-water interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%