2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12210-016-0590-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the common shrew (Sorex araneus) really a common forest species?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5), considered as generalist species. In accordance with a recent research (Lešo, Kropil, 2017) Sorex araneus should not be considered as a forest species as it was present before and its habitat preference recorded during this research affirm the statement. More movable species such as Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticus prefer an environment with bare soil and less vegetation, concurs with the result of Baláž et al (2016), which explains their occurrence at the B lines.…”
Section: Persistence Of the Species During Seasons (%)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…5), considered as generalist species. In accordance with a recent research (Lešo, Kropil, 2017) Sorex araneus should not be considered as a forest species as it was present before and its habitat preference recorded during this research affirm the statement. More movable species such as Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticus prefer an environment with bare soil and less vegetation, concurs with the result of Baláž et al (2016), which explains their occurrence at the B lines.…”
Section: Persistence Of the Species During Seasons (%)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Data on the relative abundances of shrews and the proportions of their species in small mammal communities are heterogeneous. In the Carpathian Mountains, S. araneus accounted for 0.8%, and all insectivores for only 1.3%, of the total number of small mammal individuals trapped [ 16 ]. This contrasted with the work of Benedek et al [ 17 ], who reported that the proportion of all insectivorous species in the Carpathians was 27.4%, while S. araneus alone was 23.6%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%