2019
DOI: 10.12775/lincop.2018.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the “BE compound tense” in Xhosa (Nguni) a Serial Verb Construction, or not?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My model thus explains the categorial flexibility of a single construction and its transition across various categoriessuch fluidity typifies constructions exhibiting large semantic/functional potential and is also inevitable if a broad, typological perspective is adopted (i.e., when a large set of constructions of a certain type are studied). Drawing on the seminal works authored by Aikhenvald (2006;2018;forthcoming), as well as no less important studies presented by Muysken & Veenstra (1994), Crowley (2002), Dixon (2006), andBisang (2009), and complementing them with the results of my own research (Andrason 2018a;2018b;2019a;2019b;2019c;Andrason & Vita 2020;Andrason & Koo 2020), I view the prototype (or a canon) of an asymmetrical SVC as an integrated mixture of the non-cohesive and cohesive features. Additionally, I will draw on grammaticalization theory (Hopper & Traugott 2003).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…My model thus explains the categorial flexibility of a single construction and its transition across various categoriessuch fluidity typifies constructions exhibiting large semantic/functional potential and is also inevitable if a broad, typological perspective is adopted (i.e., when a large set of constructions of a certain type are studied). Drawing on the seminal works authored by Aikhenvald (2006;2018;forthcoming), as well as no less important studies presented by Muysken & Veenstra (1994), Crowley (2002), Dixon (2006), andBisang (2009), and complementing them with the results of my own research (Andrason 2018a;2018b;2019a;2019b;2019c;Andrason & Vita 2020;Andrason & Koo 2020), I view the prototype (or a canon) of an asymmetrical SVC as an integrated mixture of the non-cohesive and cohesive features. Additionally, I will draw on grammaticalization theory (Hopper & Traugott 2003).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following my previous research on SVCs in North-West Semitic (Andrason & Vita 2020;Andrason & Koo 2020) and Indo-European languages (see Andrason 2018a;2018b;2019a), I will use a syncretic methodology that combines a semantic-map approach and an approach referred to as dynamization of typology with prototype theory and canonical typology.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Van Apart from the ILE and A grams, the resultative stream in Nguni hosts two other constructions: the BE-ILE and A-BA/YE-ILE grams. These two grams form part of a larger "compound" ILE (recent past) and A (remote past) series (see Andrason 2018). In all these constructions, the auxiliary ukuba 'be' or ukuya 'go' is inflected in the ILE (the BE-ILE gram) or the A gram (A-BA/YE-ILE), being followed by a participial form: a participial present, participial future, or, more relevant for this study, participial ILE (cf.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…242), y in ye is the "semi-vocalized" form of b found in the auxiliary ukuba.14 There are other constructions that convey the ideas of perfect and past: bendisebenza 'I used to work, was working, has been working [recent]', ndandisebenza 'I used to work, was working [remote]', sele + as 'already'; khe/zange ever/never. They will not be studied in this paper (seeAndrason 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%