2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the association between neighborhood characteristics and sleep quality mediated by psychological distress? An analysis of perceived and objective measures of 2 Pittsburgh neighborhoods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
25
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
12
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This home environment, in conjunction with a less socially cohesive neighborhood, may potentiate the risk for poor sleep via increased exposure to stress, including neighborhood-level crime and disruption, lesser parental involvement around sleep-wake routines, lesser parental knowledge of healthy sleep hygiene practices (e.g., removal of technology at bedtime). These findings are consistent with a growing body of literature suggesting the importance of considering neighborhood-level factors in influencing individual’s health behaviors (DeSantis et al, 2016; Diez Roux and Mair, 2010). In contrast with prior work and our hypotheses, however, we did not find evidence of associations between perceived neighborhood safety and monitoring with adolescent sleep problems, duration, or timing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This home environment, in conjunction with a less socially cohesive neighborhood, may potentiate the risk for poor sleep via increased exposure to stress, including neighborhood-level crime and disruption, lesser parental involvement around sleep-wake routines, lesser parental knowledge of healthy sleep hygiene practices (e.g., removal of technology at bedtime). These findings are consistent with a growing body of literature suggesting the importance of considering neighborhood-level factors in influencing individual’s health behaviors (DeSantis et al, 2016; Diez Roux and Mair, 2010). In contrast with prior work and our hypotheses, however, we did not find evidence of associations between perceived neighborhood safety and monitoring with adolescent sleep problems, duration, or timing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Second, we include key sleep outcomes, including sleep timing, duration, variability, and quality, and we found different patterns of associations for neighborhood measures in relation to these specific sleep outcomes. Third, we examined both objective (via Census data) and subjective measures of neighborhood characteristics as separate correlates of health behaviors, which is critical given evidence of differential associations between objective and subjective neighborhood characteristics and health behaviors and outcomes (DeSantis et al, 2016; Schultz et al, 2013). Fourth, our inclusion of a large, racially/ ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of youth allowed us to examine the degree to which race/ ethnicity or maternal education moderated associations between neighborhood characteristics and sleep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived safety tapped into how safe participants felt in their neighbourhood during the day and evening, and how much of a problem they perceived crime and violence to be. This perceived safety measure has demonstrated acceptable to good internal consistency [56,57]. Social cohesion assessed the level of perceived neighbourhood interconnectedness, trust, and shared values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social cohesion assessed the level of perceived neighbourhood interconnectedness, trust, and shared values. Social cohesion has been tested to have strong internal consistency [56,57]. We measured access to services [55] and traffic along nearby streets [58].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants indicate the extent to which they agree with each statement using a five-point scale, with response options ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree [42]. This measure has been demonstrated to have good internal consistency [43,44], including in the present sample (alpha ¼ 0.84).…”
Section: Measures Predictor Measuresmentioning
confidence: 87%