2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is that factor just lucky? Australian evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It generates economically and statistically significant reductions in pricing errors across test assets, even after allowing for the possibility of data mining. Our findings for monthly returns, therefore, are highly consistent with Harvey and Liu (2020) and Hoang et al (2019). However, our daily analysis reveals that essentially the same assetpricing specification is also appropriate in research contexts involving shorter return horizons.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It generates economically and statistically significant reductions in pricing errors across test assets, even after allowing for the possibility of data mining. Our findings for monthly returns, therefore, are highly consistent with Harvey and Liu (2020) and Hoang et al (2019). However, our daily analysis reveals that essentially the same assetpricing specification is also appropriate in research contexts involving shorter return horizons.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, differences in methodological approaches to factor construction are inevitable and further hinder comparisons from one paper to the next. Nevertheless, our mean monthly returns are not dissimilar to those reported in Hoang et al (2019) for PS, GP, ROE HXZ , NOA, MAX, IVOL and ROA. Of the 27 factors studied in this paper, 16 factors have mean monthly returns that are statistically different from zero at the 5 percent level of significance.…”
contrasting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations