Is telehealthcare for heart failure patients cost-effective? An economic evaluation alongside the Danish TeleCare North heart failure trial

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare in heart failure patients as add-on to usual care.DesignA cost-utility analysis was conducted from a public payer perspective alongside the randomised controlled TeleCare North trial.SettingThe North Denmark Region, Denmark.ParticipantsThe study included 274 heart failure patients with self-reported New York Heart Association class II-IV.InterventionsPatients in the intervention group were provided with a Telekit consisting of a tablet, a digital blood pressure monitor, and a scale and were instructed to perform measurements one to two times a week. The responsibility of the education, instructions and monitoring of the heart failure (HF) patients was placed on municipality nurses trained in HF and telemonitoring. Both groups received usual care.Outcome measuresCost-effectiveness was reported as incremental net monetary benefit (NMB). A micro-costing approach was applied to evaluate the derived savings in the first year in the public health sector. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained were estimated using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up.ResultsData for 274 patients were included in the main analysis. The telehealthcare solution provided a positive incremental NMB of £5164. The 1-year adjusted QALY difference between the telehealthcare solution and the usual care group was 0.0034 (95% CI: −0.0711 to 0.0780). The adjusted difference in costs was -£5096 (95% CI: −8736 to −1456) corresponding to a reduction in total healthcare costs by 35%. All sensitivity analyses showed the main results were robust.ConclusionsThe TeleCare North solution for monitoring HF was highly cost-effective. There were significant cost savings on hospitalisations, primary care contacts and total costs.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02860013.

A Cost-Minimization Analysis of a Medical Record-based, Store and Forward and Provider-to-provider Telemedicine Compared to Usual Care in Catalonia: More Agile and Efficient, Especially for Users

“…Telemedicine nowadays coexists alongside conventional healthcare in most healthcare systems [1]. Although systematic reviews of its economic impact suggest that, for the time being, it is not suited to widespread implementation in all specialties and contexts [2,3], recent studies suggest that it is cost-effective in fields such as emergency medicine, cardiology, the management of diabetes and ophthalmology [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”

The Future of Telemedicine in the Management of Heart Failure Patients

“…[ 2 , 6 , 7 ] TM reduces healthcare professionals’ burden and patients’ risks, and contributes to reducing costs. [ 2 – 7 , 9 – 15 , 21 – 25 ]…”

“…The high costs associated with HF – mainly derived from HF hospitalisations – which can be mitigated by TM. [ 2 , 3 , 14 , 15 , 21 – 25 ]…”

Digital Health Care and Social Care - Regional development impacts in the Nordic countries

“…A research report on the economic impact of this monitoring system has concluded that it is highly cost-effective for the treatment of patients with heart failure. Significant cost savings were identified in relation to hospitalisations, primary care contacts, and total expenditure (Vestergaard et al, 2020).…”