Is technology acquisition enough to improve China's product quality? Evidence from firm-level panel data

Abstract

As developing countries open themselves up to trade, many industrial firms in these countries are finding it difficult to compete internationally due to poor product quality and low product variety. Although China has been the largest producer of crude steel since 1996, China's steel firms have produced an overabundance of low-quality steel while domestic purchasers of steel have increasingly demanded higher quality steel products. Many have argued that for Chinese steel firms to improve product quality they must adopt more advanced technologies. Employing firm-level panel data of steel firms in China, we econometrically test the relative importance of two possible sets of factors affecting a firm's ability to utilize technology to improve product quality: technology acquisition factors and technology absorptive capacity factors. We find that technology complements such as in-house R&D and foreign knowledge must be combined with technology for Chinese firms to improve product quality.technological change, product quality, China,

‘The Forgotten Sector’: An Integrative Framework for Future Research on Low- and Medium-Technology Innovation

“…The government, through its role as a regulator, implementer, and procurer, remains the key influencer on LT/LMT innovation amongst firms [79][80][81]. On the one hand, the government's regulatory pressure can hinder firms' innovation propensity [82], while on the other hand, its industry support policies can influence innovation positively [83]. Stressing the need for an effective government policy, Robertson and Patel [51] point out that such a policy can also help manage the diverse nature of knowledge sources in LT/LMT industries.…”

Micro-foundational dimensions of firm internationalisation as determinants of knowledge management strategy: A case for global strategic partnerships

“…Exploring the antecedents of a firm's technology acquisition strategy is also important from the perspective of social change as the technology acquisition strategies followed by firms have larger implications in skill development and entrepreneurial capability creation at the macrolevel, especially in emerging economies (Del Giudice et al, 2019). Building these capabilities, in turn, impacts a society's capacity to generate and assimilate technological shifts especially in the form of developing university-industry collaboration, entrepreneurial networks, start-up ecosystems (Turriago-Hoyos et al, 2015) and product quality levels in the economy (Fisher-Vanden and Terry, 2009).…”