2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is sulfur-doped TiO2 an effective visible light photocatalyst for remediation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

12
99
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
12
99
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to quinoline, degradation of AN behaved almost identically with TiO 2 , S-TiO 2 , 29 and Se-TiO 2 . A lower degradation efficiency is noted for both doped catalysts, but product distributions were similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to quinoline, degradation of AN behaved almost identically with TiO 2 , S-TiO 2 , 29 and Se-TiO 2 . A lower degradation efficiency is noted for both doped catalysts, but product distributions were similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[22][23][24][25] Main group elements have been a recent focus for TiO 2 modification, and several methods to prepare titania doped with nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon have been published. [9][10][11][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Visiblelight sensitivity can be a result of localized states within the band gap and induced oxygen vacancies (Ti 3þ states). 26,31 In general, these photocatalysts have shown appreciable visible-light absorbance and some visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Ohno et al [10] reported that cationic S-doped TiO 2 showed better visible light absorption and photocatalytic activity compared to anionic S-doped TiO 2 ; in contrast, Szatmary et al [11] reported low UV photocatalytic activity of cationic S-doped TiO 2 compared to Degussa P25. Chaudhuri and Paria [12] reported enhanced visible photocatalytic activity of anionic Sdoped TiO 2 , whereas the work of Rockafellow et al [13] showed that sulphur atoms may act as deep hole trappers reducing the oxidizing power of the holes and hindering the generation of hydroxyl radicals. In spite of the extensive reports on cationic and anionic doping of TiO 2 , the visible photocatalytic activity has remained quite low, because monodoping can generate recombination centers for the photoinduced electrons and holes inside the TiO 2 [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%