2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is subterranean lifestyle reversible? Independent and recent large-scale dispersal into surface waters by two species of the groundwater amphipod genus Niphargus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, several studies on subterranean beetles (Martins & Ferreira, ; Vergnon et al, ), amphipods from caves (Delić et al, ; Fišer et al, ; Trontelj et al, ; Zakšek, Delić, Fišer, Jalžić, & Trontelj, ), interstitial habitats (Fišer, Delić, Luštrik, Zagmajster, & Altermatt, ) or deep wells (Hutchins, Schwartz, & Nowlin, ), but also spiders (Arnedo, Oromí, Múrria, Macías‐Hernández, & Ribera, ; Mammola, Arnedo, et al, ; Mammola et al, ), suggested that variation in functional traits corresponds to ecological diversification of subterranean species. These studies strongly concur with the results presented here and support the hypothesis that rather than evolutionary dead ends, subterranean organisms continue evolving and actively specializing into new microhabitats (Cieslak, Fresneda, & Ribera, ; Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Fišer, Borza, & Petrusek, ; Stern et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…By contrast, several studies on subterranean beetles (Martins & Ferreira, ; Vergnon et al, ), amphipods from caves (Delić et al, ; Fišer et al, ; Trontelj et al, ; Zakšek, Delić, Fišer, Jalžić, & Trontelj, ), interstitial habitats (Fišer, Delić, Luštrik, Zagmajster, & Altermatt, ) or deep wells (Hutchins, Schwartz, & Nowlin, ), but also spiders (Arnedo, Oromí, Múrria, Macías‐Hernández, & Ribera, ; Mammola, Arnedo, et al, ; Mammola et al, ), suggested that variation in functional traits corresponds to ecological diversification of subterranean species. These studies strongly concur with the results presented here and support the hypothesis that rather than evolutionary dead ends, subterranean organisms continue evolving and actively specializing into new microhabitats (Cieslak, Fresneda, & Ribera, ; Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Fišer, Borza, & Petrusek, ; Stern et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In North-Western Europe, Niphargus colonized freshwater during the Cretaceous, and the Mediterranean clades presumably derived from freshwater ancestors (McInerney et al, 2014). Today, virtually all Niphargus species live in subterranean freshwater, with few exceptions found in anchialine caves (Karaman & Sket, 1989;Sket & Karaman, 1990; but see also Copilaş-Ciocianu, Fišer, Borza, & Petrusek, 2018). The closest relative of Niphargus is the freshwater and anchialine genus Pseudoniphargus (Copilaş-Ciocianu, Borko, & Fišer, 2020;Jurado-Rivera et al, 2017), whereas their putative marine relatives are not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this scenario is speculative and would need to be tested, we note that cave fishes may be common exceptions to Dollo's law (Collin & Miglietta, 2008), which argues that once a complex trait is lost it is very unlikely to be re-acquired. Although cave-dwellers have been considered evolutionary "dead-ends" (Stern et al,270 2017) owing to their specialization to underground life involving the loss of eyes and pigmentation, evidence from several lineages of organisms adapted to caves including fishes (Dillman et al, 2011), salamanders (Trajano & Cobolli, 2012), scorpions (Prendini et al, 2010), and amphipods (Copilaş-Ciocianu et al, 2018) indicates that reacquisition of surface phenotypes upon recolonization from caves is indeed possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%