2013
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is student-centred learning a Western concept? Lessons from an academic development programme to support student-centred learning in Iraq

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content and language learning need to be integrated. Considering that none of the teaching staff are Western and the number of lecturers in level 3 or higher increased from 11 to 32, we concur with Jordan et al (2014) that taking a student-centred approach focusing on the learning process is not inherently a Western concept. What distinguishes level 4 is that the teaching and learning activities are fully aligned with the intended learning outcomes of the programme level taught (Biggs & Tang, 2011); the extent to which it is student-centred; the ability of lecturers to reflect on their own performance and on feedback from external sources, and to transform this into practice (Postareff et al, 2007); and explicitly supporting students in understanding assessment verbs.…”
Section: Teaching Practice Tablesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Content and language learning need to be integrated. Considering that none of the teaching staff are Western and the number of lecturers in level 3 or higher increased from 11 to 32, we concur with Jordan et al (2014) that taking a student-centred approach focusing on the learning process is not inherently a Western concept. What distinguishes level 4 is that the teaching and learning activities are fully aligned with the intended learning outcomes of the programme level taught (Biggs & Tang, 2011); the extent to which it is student-centred; the ability of lecturers to reflect on their own performance and on feedback from external sources, and to transform this into practice (Postareff et al, 2007); and explicitly supporting students in understanding assessment verbs.…”
Section: Teaching Practice Tablesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The troublesome nature of threshold concepts such as SCL may make it more likely that staff in some countries would prefer to avoid the uncomfortable liminal spaces created by troublesome concepts, and therefore prefer more convergent and less contestable forms of knowledge. In contrast to Hofstede's explanation, we argue elsewhere that this unwillingness to engage with troublesome concepts may not be culturally specific and may be better explained by individual personalities, motivations, teaching habits and philosophies (Jordan et al 2014).…”
Section: Perspectives On Learners and Learningmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In one transnational project, in which all three authors were involved, we provided an academic development programme for staff at a University in Northern Iraq that focused on supporting staff to implement student-centred learning (SCL) within curricula across the institution (Jordan et al 2014). We were invited to provide this academic development programme by senior staff in the institution, but as is common in many projects of this nature for practical reasons, many of the participants were not involved in these early negotiations of the proposed project.…”
Section: Differing Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is in such settings that students have autonomy and choice in their curricula (O'Neill and McMahon 2005). However, disciplinary differences remain as student-centred learning is more common in 'soft' disciplines (such as social science) compared to those described as 'hard' (such as physical science) (Lueddeke 2003;Lindblom-Ylänne et al 2006), and there are debates about the transferability of the concept to diverse international contexts (Jordan et al 2013). There is a dissonance between the extensive rhetoric of student-centred learning and its implementation in higher education, where there are various barriers to student-staff co-creation of the curriculum (Bovill et al 2016;O'Neill and McMahon 2005).…”
Section: Descriptive Representation Of the Student Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%