2010
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?

Abstract: In pathological urines, direct measurement of urine osmolality should be used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell hydration pathways conceivably mediate the extra weight loss because the effect is associated with intake of drinking water in excess of 1L/d [26] and/or significant urine dilution [27] (specific gravity <1.01, i.e. urine osmolality<300mmol/kg [28]). Urine dilution is a sensitive indicator of hypo-osmotic cell swelling [21, 29] (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell hydration pathways conceivably mediate the extra weight loss because the effect is associated with intake of drinking water in excess of 1L/d [26] and/or significant urine dilution [27] (specific gravity <1.01, i.e. urine osmolality<300mmol/kg [28]). Urine dilution is a sensitive indicator of hypo-osmotic cell swelling [21, 29] (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The urine specific gravity (USG) can also be used at the bedside to guide diabetes insipidus management if there is a delay in obtaining urine osmolality results from the laboratory. USG determined by both reagent strip and refractometry has a correlation of approximately 0.75 with urine osmolality [29]. This relationship between the specific gravity and osmolality is disturbed when the urine contains an abnormal solute, such as glucose or protein.…”
Section: Postoperative Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, urine dilution could disturb the assay . With regard to dilution however, only four samples with a non‐detectable result (24% of all non‐detectable samples) were strongly diluted, having an osmolality of <180 mOsm/kg (approximately corresponding to a specific gravity of <1.004, the applied cut‐off for not accepting a sample in anti‐doping procedures). In contrast, 30 samples (10%) with similarly low osmolality had positive or negative assay results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%