Is socioeconomic status associated with utilization of health care services in a single-payer universal health care system?

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess an association of Socio-economic status with utilization of health care services between years 2002 and 2008 in Israel.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the utilization of health care services in a cohort of 100,000 members, 21 years and older, of a Clalit Health Services. The research compared utilization according to the neighborhood SES status; and clinic’s location as another SES proxy. Data included: Charlson Score morbidity factor, utilization of health care services (visits to primary physicians and specialists, purchase of pharmaceuticals, number of hospitalization days, visits to ED, utilization of laboratory tests and imaging). The analysis was performed using Generalized Linear Model (GLM) technique.ResultsPeople with lower SES visited more the ED and primary physicians and were hospitalized for longer periods. People with higher SES visited more specialists, bought more prescription drugs and used more medical imaging. The associations between SES and most of the services we analyzed did not change between 2002 and 2008. However, the gap between lower and higher SES levels in ED visits and the use of prescription drugs slightly increased over time, while the gap in visits to specialists decreased.ConclusionsThe research shows that even in a universal health care system SES is associated with utilization of health care services. In order to improve equity in utilization of services the Israeli public health should reduce economic barriers and in parallel invest in making information accessible to improve “navigation skills” for all.

Regional disparities in botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) therapy for spasticity in Sweden: budgetary consequences of closing the estimated treatment gap

“…A possible reason for regional treatment variation is geographical distance to specialized clinics, which can be the case in less populated areas. In addition, metropolitan areas typically have a higher proportion of people with higher socio‐economic status, which has been shown to be positively associated with the frequency of specialist visits . The regional treatment differences shown in this study, however, do not fit these patterns of variation.…”

Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data

“…1 However, in pursuing the benefits of rebalancing care away from emergency services, a major issue is raised by the various studies across many countries that find that the share of emergency care in hospital admissions is higher for patients resident in disadvantaged areas. [2][3][4][5] This relationship shows that commissioners must expect a higher demand for emergency care in deprived areas, ceteris paribus. While this is important for planning hospital provision, 6 7 it remains unresolved whether the high use of emergency care in deprived areas is primarily a symptom of the pattern of illness in deprived areas, or rather a consequence of system weaknesses that should be specifically addressed-for example, a patient culture that overuses emergency care, or shortcomings in primary care delivery.…”

Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…As SES is a multifaceted phenomenon, the measurement and definition of SES is complex and can range from income, education, and occupation, to harder to measure variables such as health behaviour, social participation and composite measures such as social deprivation indices [6,7]. In general, low SES patients have decreased access to needed health care services, even in countries with universal health coverage [8,9].…”