2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-006-0137-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Silver fir (Abies alba) less vulnerable to extraction damage than Norway spruce (Picea abies)?

Abstract: Inspection of Norway spruce and Silver fir on experimental plots in south-western Germany showed that Silver fir had suffered significantly less bark injuries than Norway spruce. Data from both federal forest inventories (1987, 2002) showed a similar species-specific vulnerability. Additional visual inspections of the basal cross-sections of trees removed from the experimental plots showed rather high proportions of butt rot in uninjured Norway spruce (51%). The proportion further increased to 93% in trees, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surveys performed by Kohnle and Kändler (2007) corroborated empirical findings of Bazzigher and Schmid (1969), namely that bark damage in silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) is less severe than in Norway spruce, and that injuries inflicted to the bark of silver fir are less prone to lead to decay.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surveys performed by Kohnle and Kändler (2007) corroborated empirical findings of Bazzigher and Schmid (1969), namely that bark damage in silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) is less severe than in Norway spruce, and that injuries inflicted to the bark of silver fir are less prone to lead to decay.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The study provides detailed insight in histological mechanisms of ''sealing'' the wound surface, explaining the different susceptibility of the two species to fungal wound colonization. Very obviously, the relatively low wound rot risk in silver fir further bolsters the species' advantage in risk potential when compared to Norway spruce, which also suffers higher risks of butt rot, bark beetle attack, or storm damage (Kohnle and Kändler, 2007;Albrecht et al, 2012). Norway spruce is mostly planted outside its natural range, but it is currently the most important forest tree species in Southwest Germany.…”
Section: Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following wood infection, for many tree species, decay may even invade the central portions of the stem and form a typical "heart rot" that expands well above and below the surface of the bark wound (Pawsey and Gladman 1965;Shigo 1966;El Atta and Hayes 1987). Norway spruce (Picea abies) in particular is highly susceptible to wound decays that lead to degradation and serious economic losses (Dimitri and Schumann 1975;Kohnle and Kändler 2007;Metzler et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The susceptibility of Norway spruce Picea abies (L.) Karst. to wood decay caused by fungi is commonly known, and thus the majority of studies on butt rot have been focused on this species (Norokorpi 1979;Stenlid, Wästerlund 1986;Krzan 1985;Mattila, Nuutinen 2007;Kohnle, Kändler 2007). On the other hand, the significance of butt rot problem in silver fir has not been ad-equately recognised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%