2011
DOI: 10.1093/ecam/neq009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Sham Laser a Valid Control for Acupuncture Trials?

Abstract: Methodological problems of acupuncture trials focus on adequate placebo controls. In this trial we evaluated the use of sham laser acupuncture as a control procedure. Thirty-four healthy volunteers received verum laser (invisible infrared laser emission and red light, 45 s and 1 J per point) and sham laser (red light) treatment at three acupuncture points (LI4, LU7 and LR3) in a randomized, double-blinded, cross-over design. The main outcome measure was the ratio of correct to incorrect ratings of treatment im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a quarter of these studies found significant threshold changes also after sham acupuncture, while only one of the included articles reported changes of sensory thresholds after an inert control procedure. These facts go in line with the previously drawn conclusion that there are effects specific to acupuncture, but that sham acupuncture may cause physiological reactions exceeding pure placebo effects [6,108,109]. It can be assumed that this in part explains the clinical effects of sham acupuncture interventions observed in acupuncture randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Results Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, a quarter of these studies found significant threshold changes also after sham acupuncture, while only one of the included articles reported changes of sensory thresholds after an inert control procedure. These facts go in line with the previously drawn conclusion that there are effects specific to acupuncture, but that sham acupuncture may cause physiological reactions exceeding pure placebo effects [6,108,109]. It can be assumed that this in part explains the clinical effects of sham acupuncture interventions observed in acupuncture randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Results Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…prepared a randomization schedule (random permuted blocks of 6-12, stratified by acupuncturist). Participants who returned baseline questionnaires were consecutively randomized to receive laser acupuncture, sham laser acupuncture, 17 needle acupuncture, or control (no acupuncture). An investigator (K.N.)…”
Section: Randomization and Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was chosen as the control as the inactive device appears to treat acupuncture points with laser light but is inert and does not puncture the skin [9]. The laser probe is rested lightly on the skin and the inactive sham laser will be applied at the same sites for the same duration and order as the acupuncture followed by a rest period of 24 minutes and then a further two minutes of sham radiation to the two acupoints will be administered.…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%