2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is sexual body shape dimorphism consistent in aquatic and terrestrial chelonians?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is the female abdomen in both vertebrates and invertebrates that is particularly prone to evolutionary changes since it contains reproductive organs. In turtles, fecundity selects for relatively larger interval abdominal volumes in females to provide space for carrying more eggs, whereas sexual selection drives males towards larger shell openings, thereby facilitating mobility (Bonnet et al 2001(Bonnet et al , 2010Kaddour et al 2008). Lizards are another example of SShD, where fecundity favors longer female trunks for holding eggs, whereas males develop greater head size used in male-male combat (Cox et al 2003;Olsson et al 2002;Scharf and Meiri 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is the female abdomen in both vertebrates and invertebrates that is particularly prone to evolutionary changes since it contains reproductive organs. In turtles, fecundity selects for relatively larger interval abdominal volumes in females to provide space for carrying more eggs, whereas sexual selection drives males towards larger shell openings, thereby facilitating mobility (Bonnet et al 2001(Bonnet et al , 2010Kaddour et al 2008). Lizards are another example of SShD, where fecundity favors longer female trunks for holding eggs, whereas males develop greater head size used in male-male combat (Cox et al 2003;Olsson et al 2002;Scharf and Meiri 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…habitat type, also play a role in directing body shape evolution. Aquatic turtles, for example, have flatter and more streamlined shells compared with terrestrial ones (Bonnet et al 2010), and rock-dwelling lizards exhibit relatively flatter heads and bodies, adaptations that enhance locomotion (Goodman et al 2009;Revell et al 2007). These examples of vertebrate SShD, however, are not as extreme as in many invertebrates, yet invertebrates are rarely subject of comparative SShD study (Gidaszewski et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limh length could he important as well, hut has heen relatively rarely addressed in morphometric studies (see in Dordevic et al, 2011). Although important for survival (e.g., protection against predators, dehydration, uncomfortable environmental temperatures, or contribution to more efficient digging) (elaborated in Domokos & Varkonyi, 2008), the morphology of the chelonian shell has heen mostly used for describing body size and the extent of sexual size and shape dimorphism -SSD and SShD, respectively Loehr et al, 2006;Bonnet et al, 2010;Dordevic et al, 2011). Within the terrestrial genus Testudo, sexual differences in the overall shell morphology were interpreted as the outcome of different selection pressures predominantly acting on opposite sexes (Bonnet et al, 2001;Carretero et al, 2005;Ben Kaddour et al, 2008;Dordevic et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the terrestrial genus Testudo, sexual differences in the overall shell morphology were interpreted as the outcome of different selection pressures predominantly acting on opposite sexes (Bonnet et al, 2001;Carretero et al, 2005;Ben Kaddour et al, 2008;Dordevic et al, 2013). In T. hermanni (the Hermann's tortoise), both SSD and SShD have already heen analyzed in detail (Willemsen & Hailey, 2003;Vetter, 2006;Zuffi & Plaitano, 2007;Dordevic et al, 2011), hut few studies on the relation between aspects of adaptive shell morphology and RT have heen published so far (Zuffi & Plaitano, 2007;Bonnet et al, 2010;Goluhovic et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation