1986
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1986.03370060078023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Serum Creatine Kinase-MB in Electrically Injured Patients Predictive of Myocardial Injury?

Abstract: We undertook a retrospective study of 36 victims of high-voltage electrical contact injuries to determine the incidence and possible source of elevated creatine kinase (CK)-MB enzyme in their serum. Only two sustained myocardial infarctions (one late) according to history, electrocardiographic findings, and clinical course. Serum lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme levels were abnormal but revealed no myocardial infarction patterns. Creatine kinase total activity, however, reached 1.5 to 1,140 times normal in 92% … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same study, CK-MB and cTnI were not found to be higher in arrhythmic patients compared to patients without arrhythmia after EA. Several other studies also suggest that CK-MB is not a reliable marker for screening arrhythmic and cardiac complications as this can be also elevated due to skeletal muscle and soft tissue damage [17, 18]. Although cTnI is a much more sensitive cardiac biomarker than CK or CK-MB, it does not usually increase after an EA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same study, CK-MB and cTnI were not found to be higher in arrhythmic patients compared to patients without arrhythmia after EA. Several other studies also suggest that CK-MB is not a reliable marker for screening arrhythmic and cardiac complications as this can be also elevated due to skeletal muscle and soft tissue damage [17, 18]. Although cTnI is a much more sensitive cardiac biomarker than CK or CK-MB, it does not usually increase after an EA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown conflicting results concerning myocardial damage associated with high-voltage electrical injuries (8,9,12). The reasons for these differences may be related to small sample sizes and insufficient data to support the diagnosis of myocardial tissue damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion criteria as well as the monitoring periods were different in the published studies. The monitoring periods in the studies are usually 6 h, [12] 6-8 h [9] and 24 h. [2,4,13] Some of the studies evaluated patients exposed to high-voltage [4,7,14] or low-voltage [9,12] electricity, while others focused on both low and high voltage. [2] Electrical current disrupts the normal electrophysiological system by causing thermal and ischemic myocardial injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] Depending on the skeletal muscle damage in electrical injury, CK-MB can also increase. [14,21] According to some authors, the role of CK-MB in the diagnosis of myocardial injury is controversial if there is no pathognomonic ECG evidence of myocardial infarction. [5,13,21] Some authors emphasize the importance of the duration of the elevation of CK-MB levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%