2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04383-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is serum C-terminal telopeptide cross-link of type 1 collagen a reliable parameter for predicting the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws? A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
9

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological bone turnover indicators such as uncarboxylated osteocalcin (GluOC) 64 , C-terminal peptide of type I collagen (CTX-1) 98 , tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP-5b) 64 , and N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) 64 were also detected in the MRONJ assessment. However, these bone turnover indicators are still controversial as biomarkers of MRONJ 109 , 110 . The significance of bone metabolism markers of MRONJ still needs further preclinical and clinical evidence.…”
Section: Assessment Of Mronj-like Lesions In Rodent Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological bone turnover indicators such as uncarboxylated osteocalcin (GluOC) 64 , C-terminal peptide of type I collagen (CTX-1) 98 , tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP-5b) 64 , and N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) 64 were also detected in the MRONJ assessment. However, these bone turnover indicators are still controversial as biomarkers of MRONJ 109 , 110 . The significance of bone metabolism markers of MRONJ still needs further preclinical and clinical evidence.…”
Section: Assessment Of Mronj-like Lesions In Rodent Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O tipo de estudo, critérios de avaliação, perfil da população e o país avaliado parecem ser fatores importantes nesta variável. Apesar de a incidência global mais recorrente variar entre 1% e 8%, alguns autores apresentam prevalência de até 43% (Trabalousi-Garet et al, 2022;Gadgaard et al, 2022;Bullock et al, 2022;Suryani et al, 2022). Ishimaru et al, (2022), em um estudo retrospectivo com 2.819.310 pacientes, entre 2015 e 2018, relataram prevalência de 0,06% nos usuários de bisfosfonatos orais e de 1,47% em pacientes oncológicos.…”
Section: Prevalência E Incidênciaunclassified
“…Hallmer et al, (2008), em levantamento realizado na região de Skåne, Suécia, com 55 pacientes, encontrou prevalência de 0,043% para bisfosfonatos orais e 1,03% para a medicação intravenosa. Gadgaard et al, (2022) em seu estudo na Dinamarca, desenvolvido entre 2011 e 2018, incluiu 33.975 pacientes oncológicos e encontrou prevalência de 2% nos usuários de bisfosfonatos intravenosos.…”
Section: Prevalência E Incidênciaunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations