2018
DOI: 10.5070/v42811045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Sensitivity to Anticoagulant Rodenticides Affected by Repeated Exposure in Hawks?

Abstract: A seminal question in wildlife toxicology is whether exposure to an environmental contaminant, in particular a secondgeneration anticoagulant rodenticide, can evoke subtle long lasting effects on body condition, physiological function and survival. Many reports indicate that non-target predators often carry residues of several rodenticides, which is indicative of multiple exposures. An often-cited study in laboratory rats demonstrated that exposure to the second-generation anticoagulant rodenticide brodifacoum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the challenge dose in laboratory studies, or the frequency and magnitude of repeated AR exposure in free‐ranging animals carrying SGAR residues, is likely critical to this lingering effect on sensitivity (Butler ). Notably, in a companion study that used an experimental design identical to trial 3, a lower 7‐d challenge dietary exposure (i.e., 0.25 µg chlorophacinone/g wet wt diet) failed to prolong clotting time in brodifacoum‐exposed kestrels (Rattner et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the challenge dose in laboratory studies, or the frequency and magnitude of repeated AR exposure in free‐ranging animals carrying SGAR residues, is likely critical to this lingering effect on sensitivity (Butler ). Notably, in a companion study that used an experimental design identical to trial 3, a lower 7‐d challenge dietary exposure (i.e., 0.25 µg chlorophacinone/g wet wt diet) failed to prolong clotting time in brodifacoum‐exposed kestrels (Rattner et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%