2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Selectively Not Resurfacing the Patella an Acceptable Practice in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advantages of patellar resurfacing include a lower reoperation rate because of less knee pain after surgery and better 2-year postoperative Knee Society clinical scores [41][42][43] ; however, disadvantages include fracture, hardware failure, and revision difficulty. 44 Spencer et al 12 retrospectively compared the outcomes of 169 TKA procedures in 110 patients with circumferential patellar denervation (83 TKA) versus patellar resurfacing (86 TKA). At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, they found no difference in overall functional outcomes between the two groups, and both groups had nearly identical Clinical Knee Rating System kneeling scores (2.7 resurfacing vs. 2.6 denervation).…”
Section: Patellar Resurfacing Versus Nonresurfacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of patellar resurfacing include a lower reoperation rate because of less knee pain after surgery and better 2-year postoperative Knee Society clinical scores [41][42][43] ; however, disadvantages include fracture, hardware failure, and revision difficulty. 44 Spencer et al 12 retrospectively compared the outcomes of 169 TKA procedures in 110 patients with circumferential patellar denervation (83 TKA) versus patellar resurfacing (86 TKA). At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, they found no difference in overall functional outcomes between the two groups, and both groups had nearly identical Clinical Knee Rating System kneeling scores (2.7 resurfacing vs. 2.6 denervation).…”
Section: Patellar Resurfacing Versus Nonresurfacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated the superiority of resurfacing over retention of the patella [20]. On the other hand, selectively not resurfacing the patella appeared to yield similar results compared with routine resurfacing [21]. The main feature of the modern prosthesis is the modification of the femoral component, which includes a deeper and more extensive femoral trochlear groove and a smoother intercondylar box transition zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated the superiority of resurfacing over retention of the patella [20]. On the other hand, selectively not resurfacing the patella appears to yield similar results compared with routine resurfacing [21]. The main feature of the modern prosthesis is the modification of the femoral component, which includes a deeper and more extensive femoral trochlear groove and a smoother intercondylar box transition zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%