Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1974
DOI: 10.2307/3585535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Second Language Learning like the First

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
120
1
4

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
120
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Oxford (1982), based on Genesee (1978), cites the two main arguments in favor of learning foreign or second languages at younger ages: (1) the cognitivenativist argument that language learning is an innate ability that dissipates with age (Chomsky, 1972) and (2) the neurological argument that one's neural plasticity decreases with age, thus affecting language learning ability (Lenneberg, 1967). There are also several opposite arguments, focused on the fact that in some instances older learners attain higher levels of foreign or second language acquisition than their younger counterparts (Ervin-Tripp, 1974;Fathman, 1975;Burstall, 1974). Advantages for different ages have been variously attributed to: (1) prior experience in language learning, (2) onset of formal operations (Le., abstract thinking abilities), (3) cognitive maturity, (4) kind of input, (5) affective factors, (6) sociocultural factors, and (7) one or more sensitive or critical periods (Oxford, 1982).…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxford (1982), based on Genesee (1978), cites the two main arguments in favor of learning foreign or second languages at younger ages: (1) the cognitivenativist argument that language learning is an innate ability that dissipates with age (Chomsky, 1972) and (2) the neurological argument that one's neural plasticity decreases with age, thus affecting language learning ability (Lenneberg, 1967). There are also several opposite arguments, focused on the fact that in some instances older learners attain higher levels of foreign or second language acquisition than their younger counterparts (Ervin-Tripp, 1974;Fathman, 1975;Burstall, 1974). Advantages for different ages have been variously attributed to: (1) prior experience in language learning, (2) onset of formal operations (Le., abstract thinking abilities), (3) cognitive maturity, (4) kind of input, (5) affective factors, (6) sociocultural factors, and (7) one or more sensitive or critical periods (Oxford, 1982).…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, so far, creole speakers, speakers of AAVE, and English L2 learners are all consistent with the above monophthongization of English diphthongs. In what follows, an account of the child's behavior in this connection is given, thus echoing Ervin-Tripp (1974) and others' inquiry whether second language learning is like L1. The same phenomenon of monophthongization of diphthongs has been found to shape child language in general.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Snow and Hoefnägel-Höhle (1978), older second-language learners performed significantly better than their younger counterparts both in the middle and at the end of their 1-year longitudinal study. Ervin-Tripp (1974) also concluded that older second-language learners are better performers due to their more developed general intelligence. Therefore, if there are no age effects that cannot be accounted for by total length of time spent on second-language learning, then it should be easy to have a late starter who acquires L2 at a faster speed and whose L1 is mature enough to sustain possible L2 interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%