2018
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is TWEAK a valid screening questionnaire to identify alcohol risk drinkers among pregnant women in Denmark?

Abstract: In a Danish setting, TWEAK does not seem as an optimal screening tool to identify periconceptional risk drinkers but it may be useful in identifying high-risk drinking during pregnancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are alcohol screening tools that have been validated with pregnant women such as the T-ACE [42], TWEAK [43,44], and 4Ps [45] which identify indicators of problems associated with alcohol use, and use by friends and family that may influence a women’s alcohol consumption. Some researchers question the usefulness of such approaches [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are alcohol screening tools that have been validated with pregnant women such as the T-ACE [42], TWEAK [43,44], and 4Ps [45] which identify indicators of problems associated with alcohol use, and use by friends and family that may influence a women’s alcohol consumption. Some researchers question the usefulness of such approaches [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been mixed results regarding the use of the TWEAK screening tool in different countries. In Denmark, the TWEAK was found to be useful when identifying high-risk drinking during pregnancy (Praestegaard et al, 2018). When screening for alcohol use disorder (AUD) among pregnant women in Argentina, the TWEAK was found to have low reliability and did not perform as well as the AUDIT in this setting (Lopez et al, 2017).…”
Section: Alcohol Use Frequency and Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors: Henriette Kyrrestad & Sabine Kaiser Documentation and literature: The literature search identified 19 articles, of which two were included in the evaluation (Praestegaard et al, 2018;Weile et al, 2020).…”
Section: Name Of the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%