2012
DOI: 10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog001412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is scar tenderness a reliable sign of scar complications in labor?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They observed scar rupture in 3 (3.8), Scar dehiscence in 9 (11.5), thin scar (<4 mm) but intact in 14 (17.9) and normal scar in 52 (66.7). 2 These findings are consistent with the findings shown in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They observed scar rupture in 3 (3.8), Scar dehiscence in 9 (11.5), thin scar (<4 mm) but intact in 14 (17.9) and normal scar in 52 (66.7). 2 These findings are consistent with the findings shown in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…10% of the obstetric population has experienced prior cesarean delivery globally. 2 Indian women are also facing the similar rate (10.6%). 2 By decreasing the caesarian section on maternal request and repeat cesarean delivery, a check on rising caesarean section (CS) rate can be kept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Repeat cesarean section is the most common avoidable cause of rising CS rate [3,4] . 10% of obstetric population has history of prior cesarean delivery globally [5] . Indian females are also facing the similar rate (10.6%) [2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] In a a study by Gaikwad H S et al also found out the LSCS scar rupture rate was 3.8% and scar dehiscence rate was 11.5%. [7] Signs and symptoms of previous lower segment caesarean section scar dehiscence…”
Section: Lscs Scar Rupture and Dehiscencementioning
confidence: 99%