2016
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1262527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Roger Federer more loss averse than Serena Williams?

Abstract: Using data from the high-stakes 2013 Dubai professional tennis tournament, we find that, compared with a tied score, (i) male players have a higher serve speed and thus exhibit more effort when behind in score, and their serve speeds get less sensitive to losses or gains when score difference gets too large, and (ii) female players do not change their serve speed when behind, while serving slower when ahead. Thus, male players comply more with Prospect Theory exhibiting more loss aversion and reflection effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our discussion of the empirical results starts with Table 6, which provides coecient estimates for the parametric parts of models (12) and (13). Our results, consistent with Anbarci et al (2017), show that both male and female players serve significantly slower in their second attempt. Moreover, serve speed for males is significantly higher in the final round of the competition, when the stakes are the highest.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our discussion of the empirical results starts with Table 6, which provides coecient estimates for the parametric parts of models (12) and (13). Our results, consistent with Anbarci et al (2017), show that both male and female players serve significantly slower in their second attempt. Moreover, serve speed for males is significantly higher in the final round of the competition, when the stakes are the highest.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, this result can be explained with the timing of loss-aversion, as documented by Anbarci et al (2017). In order to investigate this we have a closer look at how the point di↵erence in a game and how the game di↵erence in a set a↵ects the serve speed for male and female players.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To maximize sensitivity to detect such risk-tolerance, we sought to remove some likely confounding variables. First, because there are significant gender differences in attitudes to food and calorie estimation that might be relevant to our food rewards [41,42] and in attitudes to risk/uncertainty per se [43][44][45], we restricted our sample to females.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%