2017
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(17)30714-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is restaging transurethral resection (TUR) necessary in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and focal lamina propria invasion?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable that higher rates of recurrence in patients who do not undergo reTUR in both the Herr [1] 2005 series and in our present cohort may represent an occult incomplete index resection rather than true early recurrence. Additionally, while not the subject of this specific study, there is an established need for routine reTUR in T1 lesions, with proven superiority in recurrence and progression on BCG compared with patients who did not undergo restaging [16,17]. Divrik et al [18,19] published results from a prospective trial of patients with newly diagnosed HG T1 tumors who were randomized to reTUR or no reTUR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that higher rates of recurrence in patients who do not undergo reTUR in both the Herr [1] 2005 series and in our present cohort may represent an occult incomplete index resection rather than true early recurrence. Additionally, while not the subject of this specific study, there is an established need for routine reTUR in T1 lesions, with proven superiority in recurrence and progression on BCG compared with patients who did not undergo restaging [16,17]. Divrik et al [18,19] published results from a prospective trial of patients with newly diagnosed HG T1 tumors who were randomized to reTUR or no reTUR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%