2021
DOI: 10.1080/1045988x.2021.1934376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is repeated reading evidence-based? A review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this review indicate that there is (a) mixed evidence for the effectiveness of repeated reading in improving the ORF of students identified with EBD and (b) insufficient evidence to classify the effects of repeated reading for students who are at risk for EBD. The results of this study are similar to previous reviews that have identified a need for additional, high-quality research on repeated reading (Petersen-Brown et al, 2021) and a clear paucity of research in the area of reading for students with or at risk for EBD (e.g., Garwood, 2018;McKenna & Ciullo, 2016). Similar to McKenna et al (2019), this study indicates that repeated reading can be effective in improving the ORF outcomes of students with EBD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this review indicate that there is (a) mixed evidence for the effectiveness of repeated reading in improving the ORF of students identified with EBD and (b) insufficient evidence to classify the effects of repeated reading for students who are at risk for EBD. The results of this study are similar to previous reviews that have identified a need for additional, high-quality research on repeated reading (Petersen-Brown et al, 2021) and a clear paucity of research in the area of reading for students with or at risk for EBD (e.g., Garwood, 2018;McKenna & Ciullo, 2016). Similar to McKenna et al (2019), this study indicates that repeated reading can be effective in improving the ORF outcomes of students with EBD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…More recently, the WWC (Institute of Education Sciences, 2014) has established that repeated reading has potentially positive effects on comprehension outcomes for students with LD. Finally, Petersen-Brown et al (2021) conducted an evidence-based review of repeated reading but did not focus on a target population. The results of this review did not support the classification of repeated reading as an evidence-based practice.…”
Section: Repeated Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las lecturas repetidas producen mejoras en la fluidez (National Reading Panel [NRP], 2000; Chard, Vaughn y Tyler, 2002;Lee y Yoon, 2017;Therrien, 2004), también en alumnado con bajo rendimiento en lectura (Chard et al, 2002;Stevens, Walker y Vaughn, 2017). A pesar de existir varios trabajos de revisión que muestran su eficacia, no está considerada aún como una intervención basada en evidencias (Petersen-Brown et al, 2021).…”
unclassified