2014
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2014.985368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is regulatory capital more value relevant than book value of equity? A cross-country analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far we are concerned, several arguments lead us to hypothesise that investors also price regulatory capital higher than book value of equity under the third Accord of Basel, validating results of Mechelli et al (2015) who investigate its explanatory power under the rules of the second accord.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As far we are concerned, several arguments lead us to hypothesise that investors also price regulatory capital higher than book value of equity under the third Accord of Basel, validating results of Mechelli et al (2015) who investigate its explanatory power under the rules of the second accord.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These results contribute to the literature for twofold. First, the paper provides evidence that regulatory capital continues to be more value relevant than book value of equity under the new rules of the third accord of Basel, validating the results of Mechelli et al (2015) who investigate its explanatory power under the rules of the second accord. Second, the paper fills the gap resulting from the absence of papers that investigate the usefulness for investors' decisions of the single parts of regulatory capital devoted to absorb losses due to the risk profile of the bank.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation