Is Real Estate Private Equity Real Estate?

Anderson, Randy I.; Rottke, Nico B.; Krautz, Sebastian; Berry, James; Webb, James

doi:10.15396/eres2015_73

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While affordable rental housing presents several risks (capital risk on property value, rental yield risks, and political risk associated with changing policies) (Berry and Hall, 2005), financial liberalisation and changes in state housing policies in the US and Germany have created market conditions favourable to risk-oriented investors. A focus on high returns makes private equity funds an especially attractive vehicle (Rottke, 2004). Investment banks, private firms or other real estate players create and manage real estate private equity funds by collecting money from institutional investors and leveraging credit capital from banks.…”

Section: Financialising Rental Housingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This makes a property’s location and conditions of negligible importance: ‘even a property with little or no residual value can still be extremely valuable’ (Linneman, 2004: 126); a lower-value portfolio may be sought for its low purchasing prices. Ultimately, funds aim to sell or exit their investment through a rate of return in excess of the price paid, usually within one to seven years (Rottke, 2004).…”

Section: Financialising Rental Housingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The financialisation of rental housing: A comparative analysis of New York City and Berlin

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version -refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher's website. TakedownIf you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. AbstractThis paper compares how recent waves of private equity real estate investment have reshaped the rental housing markets in New York and Berlin. Through secondary analysis of separate primary research projects, we explore financializationÕs impact on tenants, neighborhoods, and urban space. Despite contrasting market contexts and investor strategies, financialization heightened existing inequalities in housing affordability and stability, and rearranged spaces of abandonment and gentrification in both cities. Conversely cities themselves also shaped the process of financialization, with weakened rental protections providing an opening to transform affordable housing into a new global asset class. We also show how financializationÕs adaptability in the face of changing market conditions entails ongoing, but shifting processes of uneven development. Comparative studies of financialization can help highlight geographically disparate, but similar exposures to this global process, thus contributing to a critical urban politics of finance that crosses boundaries of space, sector and scale.Forthcoming in Urban Studies (special issue: Financialization and the Production of Urban Space)

show abstract

Section: Financialising Rental Housingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Financialising Rental Housingmentioning

confidence: 99%