2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.84.2064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Random Close Packing of Spheres Well Defined?

Abstract: Despite its long history, there are many fundamental issues concerning random packings of spheres that remain elusive, including a precise definition of random close packing (RCP). We argue that the current picture of RCP cannot be made mathematically precise and support this conclusion via a molecular dynamics study of hard spheres using the Lubachevsky-Stillinger compression algorithm. We suggest that this impasse can be broken by introducing the new concept of a maximally random jammed state, which can be m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

52
1,182
9
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,257 publications
(1,251 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
52
1,182
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (determined for 310 nm spheres) for SiO 2 unsupported membrane derived from the sol with pH 2.7. Random close packing with a distribution of particle sizes typically yields a porosity of 0.36 [19]. The H-K pore sizes determined for the unsupported membranes consolidated from the 5 nm sphere sols with pH 2.7 and pH 3.5 compared quite well with the geometrically calculated throat sizes of about 0.77 nm for close packed structures.…”
Section: Particle Size and Pore Structure Determinationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…3 (determined for 310 nm spheres) for SiO 2 unsupported membrane derived from the sol with pH 2.7. Random close packing with a distribution of particle sizes typically yields a porosity of 0.36 [19]. The H-K pore sizes determined for the unsupported membranes consolidated from the 5 nm sphere sols with pH 2.7 and pH 3.5 compared quite well with the geometrically calculated throat sizes of about 0.77 nm for close packed structures.…”
Section: Particle Size and Pore Structure Determinationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For all of the order parameters discussed here, the cutoff radius is defined by the first minimum in the pair correlation function, in this case 1.45a. Q 6 is approximately 0.575 for a perfect fcc crystal; for jammed structures, it can exhibit a large range of values less than about 0.37 [34]. The full distribution of Q 6 for our model glass is shown for several ages as well as an initial melt state in Fig.…”
Section: Structural Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putting the question this way, we immediately run into difficulties because by considering different degrees of crystallinity, we can obtain a continuum of denser packings [49]. The random models studied here allow us to avoid -at least to fix ideas -the conceptual complication of crystallization, and to concentrate on the glassy aspects [45].…”
Section: The J-pointmentioning
confidence: 99%