“…3,4 Studies of different ethnic groups have shown a difference in the anatomical shapes of the distal femur and the proximal tibia, which may affect the choice of the implants and the optimum placement of the component, of these anthropometric measurements, the rotational profile of the distal femur which was studied in Indians, 5,6 Iranians, 7,8 Japanese, 9,10 Chinese, 11,12 and Caucasians. 13 Moreover, inter-individual variations were reported in a population of the same study, 5,14 which drove some authors to suggest the necessity of individualizing the femoral component rotation based on preoperative distal femoral torsion (DFT) measured values. 14,15 Computed tomography (CT) is considered as the standard imaging technique to evaluate the DFT of the native knee or component rotation of the replaced knee; however, routine CT use may not be feasible with the added risk of radiation exposure, and in some patients, detection of anatomical landmarks is difficult.…”