2013
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e318286b18a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Radiation-Free Diagnostic Monitoring of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Feasible Using Upright Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Abstract: Our results show that uMRI is capable of producing coronal and sagittal plane measurements that highly correlate with traditional plain film radiographical measurements. This, in addition to reliable vertebral rotation measurements, makes uMRI a valuable, radiation-free alternative/substitute for diagnostic evaluation in AIS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Open MRI machines permit scanning from a standing patient position, making these images suitable for scoliosis angle measurement. Unfortunately, MRI is less accessible than X-ray due to its high cost and the patient has to stand motionless for several minutes while the scanner captures the entire spinal column, which further limits its use for routine monitoring in an adolescent population [9].…”
Section: Scoliosis Monitoring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open MRI machines permit scanning from a standing patient position, making these images suitable for scoliosis angle measurement. Unfortunately, MRI is less accessible than X-ray due to its high cost and the patient has to stand motionless for several minutes while the scanner captures the entire spinal column, which further limits its use for routine monitoring in an adolescent population [9].…”
Section: Scoliosis Monitoring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major drawbacks of these methods are their unreliability, poor reproducibility, inability to assess vertebral body rotation, inability to assess anything apart from the main structural curve, and no capability to assess the sagittal profile. [37][38][39][40] However, it was shown that in the clinical setting, this method and other methods using the similar principle can be applied in particular to pregnant scoliotic patients for whom radiography is contraindicated 41 and in cases that do not need surgical intervention as a screening and monitoring tool. 37,42 Therefore, this method does offer another approach to monitoring changes of curvatures in AIS subjects.…”
Section: Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, real-time in vivo assessment of the spinal curves magnitude, sagittal alignment, rotational/axial spine measurements, and intervertebral disk health are made possible. 40 Diefenbach et al 40 in the first ever study to use upright position MRI found that upright MRI was not only reliable, reproducible, and accurate, but it showed outstanding correlation between the gold standard standing radiographic and upright MRI measurements (i.e., Cobb angles and vertebral rotation).…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimension analysis usually underestimates spine deformation [2] and is considered of limited reliability and accuracy in assessment of vertebral rotation [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scanning have been proposed as an alternative to quantify vertebral rotation [9,10]. However, as CT and MR are performed in a supine position, vertebral rotational information obtained may not accurately reflect deformation in the usual upright position [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scanning have been proposed as an alternative to quantify vertebral rotation [9,10]. However, as CT and MR are performed in a supine position, vertebral rotational information obtained may not accurately reflect deformation in the usual upright position [9,10]. Furthermore, the radiation dose associated with CT remains significant [11] [12], especially for children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%