2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2896508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, to collect and analyze federal 20 This argument was recently endorsed by Justice Clarence Thomas in concurrence in Ziglar v. Abbasi (2017). Citing Baude (2018), Justice Thomas noted his "growing concern with our qualified immunity jurisprudence" (Ziglar v. Abbasi, 2017, p. 1870.…”
Section: Prior Empirical Research and Methodology Of Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, to collect and analyze federal 20 This argument was recently endorsed by Justice Clarence Thomas in concurrence in Ziglar v. Abbasi (2017). Citing Baude (2018), Justice Thomas noted his "growing concern with our qualified immunity jurisprudence" (Ziglar v. Abbasi, 2017, p. 1870.…”
Section: Prior Empirical Research and Methodology Of Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one just focused on Supreme Court decisions, that assumption would be warranted. Of the scores of qualified immunity cases that the Supreme Court has decided since it created the modern version of the defense in Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982) including many involving the use of deadly force by police officers, a majority of Justices has almost always found that officers should have been granted qualified immunity (Baude, 2018, p. 82).…”
Section: An Overview Of Qualified Immunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Qualified immunity has been used since the mid-1960s to protect officers (and government employees more broadly) from being held liable for reasonable actions they undertook that were part of their job. Qualified immunity was introduced as a measure to limit the liability of government officials while performing their duties (see, e.g., Baude, 2018) and attempts to prevent officers from feeling that they cannot fully do their jobs "due to the fear of litigation and subsequent personal monetary liability" (Braaten and Vaughn, 2021). Critics of qualified immunity in its modern application, however, suggest that it is used as "an absolute shield for even the most egregious law enforcement conduct" (Braaten and Vaughn, 2021).…”
Section: What We Knowmentioning
confidence: 99%