Continuous Transcutaneous Monitoring 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1927-6_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Pulse Oximetry Reliable in Detecting Hyperoxemia in the Neonate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, 95% SpO 2 was both the upper and lower alarm limit required to prevent 95% of hyperoxic and hypoxic episodes. Similar to other studies on various brands of oximeters, 8 , 12 , 16 the alarm limits suggested for the Marquette 8000 oximeter are associated with relatively low specificities (43%, 54%, respectively), contributing to a high rate of false alarms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, 95% SpO 2 was both the upper and lower alarm limit required to prevent 95% of hyperoxic and hypoxic episodes. Similar to other studies on various brands of oximeters, 8 , 12 , 16 the alarm limits suggested for the Marquette 8000 oximeter are associated with relatively low specificities (43%, 54%, respectively), contributing to a high rate of false alarms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…From previous studies, it is clear that there are considerable differences in bias and precision between brands of oximeters 7 , 8 , 12 , 14 –17 . For the Nellcor N‐100, an alarm limit of 96% SpO 2 12 detected at least 95% of all hyperoxic episodes (PaO 2 >90 mmHg), whereas for the Ohmeda Biox 3700 an alarm limit of 89% SpO 2 12 – 90% SpO 2 8 was required to achieve this goal. There are few studies which discuss the lower alarm limits for the prevention of hypoxic episodes in neonates 9 , 15 –17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations