2014
DOI: 10.1177/0972063413518679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Public Private Partnership an Effective Alternative to Government in the Provision of Primary Health Care? A Case Study in Odisha

Abstract: Existing public health services are inadequate to cater to the growing demands of quality health care. Public Private Partnership (PPP) has evolved over the last decade as a newer arrangement. This study aimed to understand the breadth and depth of services in primary health centres (PHC) under government (PHC-GOV), NGO (PHC-NGO) and corporate (PHC-COR) management in Kendrapara district of Odisha. One PHC from each model was selected at random. Compliance with Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS), programme p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
16
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…medicines, whereas laboratory service was better in PHC-NGO and PHC-COR. 27 A study while analysing the challenges of PPP health facilities suggests that, involvement of NGOs in health planning is nearly non-existence but government expect them to participate in the final phase of implementation of any programs. Further, the mismatch between the grassroots needs and the government agenda make the partnership more complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…medicines, whereas laboratory service was better in PHC-NGO and PHC-COR. 27 A study while analysing the challenges of PPP health facilities suggests that, involvement of NGOs in health planning is nearly non-existence but government expect them to participate in the final phase of implementation of any programs. Further, the mismatch between the grassroots needs and the government agenda make the partnership more complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that, despite substantial contributions and previous successes, provision of PHC services solely via the public sector providers has its limitation and some potential problems are well-documented (e.g., shortage of human resources, inefficient institutional frameworks, inadequate quality and efficiency due to a lack of competition, particularly in remote and rural areas) [ 4 , 5 ]. In response to these challenges, some suggested that public-private partnerships (PPPs) initiatives could help to make PHC services provision more effective and efficient [ 6 – 12 ]. PPPs are voluntary cooperative arrangements between two and more public and private sectors in which all participants agree to work together to achieve a common purpose or undertake a specific task and to share risks and responsibilities, resources and benefits [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was previously shown that among the main reasons for service uptake from private PHC providers were better geographic access, shorter waiting times, more flexible opening hours, easier access to staff consultations and medication, and more confidentiality regarding disease-related symptoms [ 4 , 17 – 20 ]. Moreover, the use of PPPs can significantly reassure and reduce the fear of privatising health care services [ 6 ]. Not surprisingly, PPPs are rapidly expanding and becoming an integral part of effective health interventions [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published experiences with PPP implementation in PHC in different countries (8)(9)(10)(11) have provided various and sometimes contradictory results on the use of PPP in PHC, and there is no study that thoroughly examines this issue. That is why there is a need to examine the experiences and achievements of PPP in PHC worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%