2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Protein Folding a Thermodynamically Unfavorable, Active, Energy-Dependent Process?

Abstract: The prevailing current view of protein folding is the thermodynamic hypothesis, under which the native folded conformation of a protein corresponds to the global minimum of Gibbs free energy G. We question this concept and show that the empirical evidence behind the thermodynamic hypothesis of folding is far from strong. Furthermore, physical theory-based approaches to the prediction of protein folds and their folding pathways so far have invariably failed except for some very small proteins, despite decades o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
(187 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with the idea that the native structures of some proteins may be determined by kinetics rather than thermodynamics. One implication is that the solution to the structure prediction problem for such proteins in cell may depend on the solution to the protein folding problem, and in-cell protein folding may be an active, energy-dependent process [ 104 ]. Predicting the cellular conformation of these proteins—in the presence of ATP-driven chaperones—may require the search for folding pathways that limit the exposures of cochaperone-binding, e.g., hydrophobic, sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with the idea that the native structures of some proteins may be determined by kinetics rather than thermodynamics. One implication is that the solution to the structure prediction problem for such proteins in cell may depend on the solution to the protein folding problem, and in-cell protein folding may be an active, energy-dependent process [ 104 ]. Predicting the cellular conformation of these proteins—in the presence of ATP-driven chaperones—may require the search for folding pathways that limit the exposures of cochaperone-binding, e.g., hydrophobic, sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with the idea that the native structures of some proteins may be determined by kinetics rather than thermodynamics. One implication is that the solution to the structure prediction problem for such proteins in cell may depend on the solution to the protein folding problem, and in-cell protein folding may be an active, energy-dependent process [91]. Predicting the cellular conformation of these proteins—in the presence of ATP-driven chaperones—may require the search for folding pathways that limit the exposures of cochaperone-binding, e.g .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the article by Koonin [ 123 ] and the previous works of his co-authors [ 108 , 124 , 125 , 126 ] consider an alternative hypothesis of protein folding, the kinetic one, according to which the native conformation of most proteins is not in the global but rather at a local minimum in the fluctuating free energy landscape. Moreover, the free energy values are probably positive for most proteins, which implies the energy costs to adopt a native conformation, which is only possible as a result of the interaction of these proteins with the molecular machines of the cell, such as translation systems or chaperones.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Formation Of Misfolded Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%