1988
DOI: 10.1016/0958-3947(88)90071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Prophylactic Para-Aortic Irradiation Worthwhile in the Treatment of Advanced Cervical Carcinoma? Results of a Controlled Clinical Trial of the EORTC Radiotherapy Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
2
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, two DNA bands of 6.2 and 5.0 kb were observCervical cancers are treated by surgery, radiation and cytotoxic drugs (Friedlander et al, 1983;Haie et al, 1988;McGuire et al, 1989). Treatment depends on prognosis which is determined by clinicopathological parameters of which the most important are clinical stage at diagnosis and nodal status (Pejovic et al, 1981).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…As expected, two DNA bands of 6.2 and 5.0 kb were observCervical cancers are treated by surgery, radiation and cytotoxic drugs (Friedlander et al, 1983;Haie et al, 1988;McGuire et al, 1989). Treatment depends on prognosis which is determined by clinicopathological parameters of which the most important are clinical stage at diagnosis and nodal status (Pejovic et al, 1981).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…7 Extended-field radiation itself incurs a high rate of intestinal morbidity 8,9 and prophylactic treatment of the para-aortic region has not been conclusively shown to provide any survival benefit. 10,11 Unfortunately, in patients with unresectable disease, cervical biopsy material alone does not provide reliable histopathologic features to predict the presence of lymphatic invasion, nodal metastasis, or patient outcome to guide in therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IIb and III), does not show any bene®t in survival, local control or overall distant metastases [14]. There was a clear increase in the incidence of severe digestive complications in patients receiving para-aortic irradiation (9 vs. 4.8%) [14,41]. However, considering the reduced incidence of para-aortic and distant metastases in patients without recurring tumor at pelvic sites, if treated with extended ®elds, the authors proposed to treat para-aortic nodes where there is a high probability of local control [14].…”
Section: Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There was a clear increase in the incidence of severe digestive complications in patients receiving para-aortic irradiation (9 vs. 4.8%) [14,41]. However, considering the reduced incidence of para-aortic and distant metastases in patients without recurring tumor at pelvic sites, if treated with extended ®elds, the authors proposed to treat para-aortic nodes where there is a high probability of local control [14]. In the present survey, about 90% of the centers are treating this large volume if they have arguments for positive para-aortic and/or pelvic lymph nodes.…”
Section: Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation