Is profit sharing good for the environment? Positive evidence from French firms

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to look at the effect of profit sharing (PS) on the ability of the firm to take care of the environment. Design/methodology/approach In a large cross-section of French firms, the authors find strong associations between PS and various innovations with environmental benefits. With cross-sectional data from the Community Innovation Survey and FARE, the authors estimate simultaneous equations for these effects, with endogenous PS. Findings This relationship between PS and environmental innovation is plausible, since workers benefit more than outside owners from a better local environment. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper provides the first empirical evidence, so the results suggest PS supports environmental policy, in addition to its other, better known incentive benefits. Research limitations/implications Further studies, using panel data, are needed. Practical implications Financial participation may be considered as an additional tool to protect the environment. Originality/value This is the first paper looking at the impact of PS on the ability of the firm to take care of the environment. In this critical period when policy makers are searching for ways to limit global warming and protect the environment, the authors have presented here the first evidence that financial participation helps to support these policies.

Employee financial participation and corporate social and environmental performance: Evidence from European panel data

“…This may result in a stronger collective orientation on economic performance than on CSP. However, recent research by Fakhfakh and Fitzroy (2018) has suggested a positive relationship between profit‐sharing plans and the environmental performance of French companies. Their interpretation of the unexpected result is that profit‐sharing plans may be associated with involvement in decision‐making, supporting environmental improvements with, in the end, higher collective benefits.…”

Political Freedom, Economic Freedom and Co2 Emission in Long Run: Evidence from ASEAN Countries

“…The Environmental Kuznets Curve can only be explained by the developing countries. The relation between quality of environment and democracy was explored by Fakhfakh, and FitzRoy (2018), using data of almost 141 developing countries for time 1976-2003. The variables used as the measure of environmental quality were emissions of water pollution, emissions of CO2 emissions and deforestation.…”

Overcoming the capital investment hurdle in worker-controlled firms

“…Moreover, there is growing body of evidence showing the substantial benefits in terms of the firm’s sustainability and resilience, “static” productivity, income, and worker job satisfaction and health which stem from the combination of profit sharing, employee ownership[2] and the flattening of workplace hierarchies along with some form of participatory or democratic management[3] and “ownership culture” (Blasi et al , 2017; Fakhfakh et al , 2012; McDonnell, 2012; Nuttall, 2012; Pérotin, 2017; Rosen, 2011)[4]. Workplace democracy and employee ownership, as well as being about sharing the pie more fairly, are also about growing the pie more effectively – in a better and possibly greener way (Fakhfakh and FitzRoy, 2018).…”