Is productivity diverging in the EU? Evidence from 11 Member States

Emvalomatis, Grigorios

doi:10.1007/s00181-016-1161-x

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 49 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…National empirical case studies have been conducted in Germany, focusing on the productivity factors of internal and external collaboration innovation (Hensen and Dong 2020), and in Canada, examining the relationship between digital training and economic growth (Walker et al 2018). Multi-factor productivity studies using sector-level data from the European Union have also been conducted (Emvalomatis 2017), and digital innovation valuation in Africa has been analyzed using a sector-based approach (Foster et al 2018). Productivity growth across many developed economies has been analyzed using a multi-country and multi-sector approach (Remes et al 2018).…”

Section: Various Approaches To Digital Intangibles Valuationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standalone Valuation Method for Software-as-a-Service Operational Knowledge Derived from Human Intellectual Capital Qualitative Changes

Sakuma,

Furutani

2024

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on digital operational knowledge belonging to natural persons and proposes a greenfield approach to differentiate the value of intangibles from that of human intellectual capital. Our research approach involves two assessments. Assessment 1 evaluates intangible assets using the internally generated goodwill (IGG) measure. We analyze time-series IGG data for six digital sectors, using the top 90 software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies as a benchmark. The results indicate that the IGG of the SaaS benchmark is higher than the total IGG of the six sectors. Assessment 2 focuses on the correlation between digital labor investment and digital investment returns before and after 2013 for the six sectors to identify positive and negative correlations from 2013 onward. The results indicate that, since 2013, a qualitative change has occurred in digital labor capital that has not been reflected in financial statements because of accounting distortions and that the returns on investment for digital labor have been underestimated. The standalone valuation of digital know-how that belongs to natural persons, previously based on operating expense, will be based on capital expenditure. In addition, amortization will have the same contribution as depreciation of tangible assets to value creation.

show abstract

Section: Various Approaches To Digital Intangibles Valuationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standalone Valuation Method for Software-as-a-Service Operational Knowledge Derived from Human Intellectual Capital Qualitative Changes

Sakuma,

Furutani

2024

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This act can strengthen the monetary union and improvement in the economic institutions. The barrier-free trade and commerce shape the higher income and productivity rate (Berry et al, 2014;Chambers and Dhongde, 2017;Delgado et al, 2010;Emvalomatis, 2017;Martin, 2005;Matkowski and Próchniak, 2007;Saygılı, 2017;Voigt et al, 2014).…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Economic Integration of the Central and Eastern European Countries into the European Union: Special Reference to Regional Development

Bharti

2022

CPLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to research on the Central and Eastern European countries’ (CEECs) economic development after joining the European Union (EU). Moreover, this study highlights the key policies of economic integration into the EU and integration is a success story for the CEE countries. This paper also describes the key indicators and tools of the development model adopted by the CEE countries as a member of the EU. This study covers the period from 2004 to 2021. The objective of this study is to relate to the EU’s economic and trade policies, and how they brought the development to the region after the successful integration. To what extent, the CEE countries could develop their economic position in comparison to the other EU member countries. The research used empirical and comparative analysis methods to search the economic growth and regional development. Through this method, the research answers the questions and tests the hypothesis. The study concludes that the economic integration of the CEECs into the EU is successful. As a result, the development of this region has been accelerated and the EU’s economic policies have successfully been implemented in many countries. Finally, The EU’s economic policy has changed the dynamics of regions’ development and shaped the stronger trade and common market among the member states. The EU’s integration has impacted the gradual economic growth across the CEE countries.

show abstract

Are future enlargement candidate countries converging with the EU?

Kollias

Messis

2019

Empirica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Is productivity diverging in the EU? Evidence from 11 Member States

Cited by 5 publications

References 49 publications

Standalone Valuation Method for Software-as-a-Service Operational Knowledge Derived from Human Intellectual Capital Qualitative Changes

Standalone Valuation Method for Software-as-a-Service Operational Knowledge Derived from Human Intellectual Capital Qualitative Changes

The Economic Integration of the Central and Eastern European Countries into the European Union: Special Reference to Regional Development

Are future enlargement candidate countries converging with the EU?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About