2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is problematic Internet use associated with alcohol and cannabis use among youth? A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the study participants, 26.6% and 13.7% met the criteria for PAU using CAGE ≥ 1 and CAGE ≥ 2 cut-offs, respectively, with PAU+ individuals showing significantly lower mentalization capacity than controls. Our findings are consistent with a recent study on adults (age range: 18-81) showing a significant inverse correlation of mentalization skills with food addiction and lifetime alcohol-related problems [14], as well as with epidemiological data suggesting that the prevalence of PAU among the young ranges between 2.5% and 87.9% [30]. These data are also consistent with preliminary evidence linking low mentalization capacity to addiction-related disturbances in areas different from alcohol [12][13][14][15]; it has been proposed that the use of substances in subjects with a low mentalization capacity can be conceptualized as an attempt to regulate, through specific goal-directed and rewarding behaviors, unmentalized self-states [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the study participants, 26.6% and 13.7% met the criteria for PAU using CAGE ≥ 1 and CAGE ≥ 2 cut-offs, respectively, with PAU+ individuals showing significantly lower mentalization capacity than controls. Our findings are consistent with a recent study on adults (age range: 18-81) showing a significant inverse correlation of mentalization skills with food addiction and lifetime alcohol-related problems [14], as well as with epidemiological data suggesting that the prevalence of PAU among the young ranges between 2.5% and 87.9% [30]. These data are also consistent with preliminary evidence linking low mentalization capacity to addiction-related disturbances in areas different from alcohol [12][13][14][15]; it has been proposed that the use of substances in subjects with a low mentalization capacity can be conceptualized as an attempt to regulate, through specific goal-directed and rewarding behaviors, unmentalized self-states [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similar patterns of results were observed using CAGE cut-off ≥ 2 (Table 3), although, in this case, a gender difference was observed, with more men in the PAU+ group than in the PAU− group (48.6% vs. 29.9%; χ 2 = 5.11 p = 0.024; r = 0.137). As previous reports showed differences between younger (18-24) and older (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34) young adults in the prevalence of substance misuse (e.g., [29]), age-related comparisons were performed, showing that younger young adults had increased illegal drugs use (p = 0.034) and decreased MZQ total score (p = 0.009) compared to older young adults (Supplementary Materials Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, most up to date studies, performed in student populations, suggest PIU to be associated with academic procrastination (13), poor quality of life (14,15), severe psychiatric disorders (16)(17)(18), and even suicide attempts (19). PIU, as an addictive behavioral pattern, is also found to be comorbid with other addictive disorders, such as substance abuse among youth, including cannabis and alcohol use (20) as well as gambling disorder (21,22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Problem-Behavior Theory of Jessor [ 3 ], associations between problematic alcohol and problematic use of the Internet or specific online applications seem not unlikely, but relatively few empirical findings on these relations have been published. Relationships between problematic Internet use and general substance use in adolescents have been investigated more frequently (see for example the systematic review of Lanthier-Labonté et al [ 23 ]). However, it is important to distinguish between general alcohol consumption (which in Germany occurs among a majority of minors) and problematic alcohol use in adolescence (which only affects a minority, but which clearly can have serious consequences, see for instance the review of McCambridge et al [ 24 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%