2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is port-site resection necessary in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, while patients with in-situ and intramucosal carcinomas are all alive after a mean follow-up of 69 months, T2 and T3 lesions showed, overall, an unsatisfactory prognosis with a median of 19 and 5 months for the two groups, respectively; these findings coincide with those reported by many authors [7,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, while patients with in-situ and intramucosal carcinomas are all alive after a mean follow-up of 69 months, T2 and T3 lesions showed, overall, an unsatisfactory prognosis with a median of 19 and 5 months for the two groups, respectively; these findings coincide with those reported by many authors [7,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, the frequent occurrence of the gallbladder carcinoma in the seventh and eighth life decade [3] (8 patients in our group are more than 75 years old) could make problematic the indication to a demanding surgical procedure comprising an extended liver resection and nodal dissection, in which are described postoperative complication rates up to 30-40% [8,9], even in the more recent literature [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various factors have been proposed that could possibly be involved in the development of such port site metastases [8]. In fact, port site resection has been attempted in patients with incidentally discovered GBC after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although it has not been found to affect the outcome [9]. 18 F-FDG PET/CT is a robust tool in oncological imaging, useful in a variety of cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Port-site excision is to be considered in case when the diagnosis is made incidentally based on the histopathological assessment of the cholecystectomy specimen. The practice of excising port-sites is not routinely imposed as it does not modify the survival rate of these patients [10].…”
Section: Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomymentioning
confidence: 99%