2021
DOI: 10.1093/isd/ixab018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Phylogeographic Congruence Predicted by Historical Habitat Stability, or Ecological Co-associations?

Abstract: Comparative phylogeographic studies can distinguish between idiosyncratic and community-wide responses to past environmental change. However, to date, the impacts of species interactions have been largely overlooked. Here we used non-genetic data to characterize two competing scenarios about expected levels of congruence among five deadwood-associated (saproxylic) invertebrate species (i.e., a wood-feeding cockroach, termite, and beetle; a predatory centipede, and a detritivorous millipede) from the southern A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional criteria for lineage fusion candidacy might include the absence of spatial genetic structure or phylogeographic structure within a given species, despite its broad geographic distribution across an area known to have harbored multiple Pleistocene refugia, coupled with the presence of strong spatial genetic structure or phylogeographic structure of co‐distributed members of the same ecological community (Garrick et al., 2019 ). Other circumstances conducive to lineage fusion would include paleoclimatic ecological niche models and/or spatial projections of climatic stability surfaces (e.g., Garrick et al., 2021 ; Hyseni & Garrick, 2019 ) that clearly indicate historical disjunction of present‐day unstructured populations. Indeed, these and other criteria for lineage fusion candidacy could be used to formulate expectations prior to re‐analysis of publicly available genetic datasets from ecologically and taxonomically diverse taxa, to investigate the prevalence of lineage fusion in nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional criteria for lineage fusion candidacy might include the absence of spatial genetic structure or phylogeographic structure within a given species, despite its broad geographic distribution across an area known to have harbored multiple Pleistocene refugia, coupled with the presence of strong spatial genetic structure or phylogeographic structure of co‐distributed members of the same ecological community (Garrick et al., 2019 ). Other circumstances conducive to lineage fusion would include paleoclimatic ecological niche models and/or spatial projections of climatic stability surfaces (e.g., Garrick et al., 2021 ; Hyseni & Garrick, 2019 ) that clearly indicate historical disjunction of present‐day unstructured populations. Indeed, these and other criteria for lineage fusion candidacy could be used to formulate expectations prior to re‐analysis of publicly available genetic datasets from ecologically and taxonomically diverse taxa, to investigate the prevalence of lineage fusion in nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar population structures among different forest species reflect the common demographic responses to historic bioclimatic change and ecological co-associations (Garrick et al. 2021). For example, midcontinent biogeographic breaks, similar to what we observed in M. disstria , have been detected in other forest animals, including Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) (Lumley et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combinations of drift and adaptation in these regions have led to intra-and interspecific diversification in many forest species. Similar population structures among different forest species reflect the common demographic responses to historic bioclimatic change and ecological co-associations (Garrick et al 2021). For example, midcontinent biogeographic breaks, similar to what we observed in M. disstria, have been detected in other forest animals, including Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) (Lumley et al 2020), Lynx canadensis (Carnivora: Felidae) (Stenseth et al 1999;Rueness et al 2003), Ursus americanus (Carnivora: Ursidae) (Puckett et al 2015; but see Bradburd et al 2018), Campanula americana (Campanulaceae) (Prior et al 2020), and Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) (Yi and Latch 2022).…”
Section: Population Genomics Of the Forest Tent Caterpillarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, genetic variation is also influenced by the legacy of historical events that have driven fluctuations in effective population size ( N e ). The impact of Quaternary climate variation on genetic diversity is well‐recognized (Hewitt, 2000 ), and recent studies have more explicitly examined links between species range stability and genetic diversity (Carnaval et al, 2009 ; Garrick et al, 2021 ; Koch et al, 2018 ). Revealing how landscape changes drive declines and recovery in N e has thus become important for reconstructing evolutionary histories, but also for interpreting contemporary genetic diversity and making predictions about vulnerability to environmental change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%