2012
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is oximetry an effective screening tool for obstructive sleep apnoea in children with Down syndrome?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not use detailed follow-up to evaluate the sensitivity of the McGill oximetry score in this population, 14 but we contend that with, a few caveats, oximetry scores will prove useful in the identifi cation of the highest risk patients for early evaluation and possible treatment, particularly within clinical research protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not use detailed follow-up to evaluate the sensitivity of the McGill oximetry score in this population, 14 but we contend that with, a few caveats, oximetry scores will prove useful in the identifi cation of the highest risk patients for early evaluation and possible treatment, particularly within clinical research protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since PSG was the reference standard to accurately diagnose OSA, 13 studies were excluded due to their use of parental questionnaire [14]- [26] or endoscope [27]- [29]; three studies were excluded due to their use of pulse oximetry, a less accurate indicator of OSA [9], [30], [31] and/or in-home sleep studies [11]; 24 studies were eliminated because only partial or incomplete information was provided [2], [32]- [40], [27], [41]- [53]; three were excluded due to imaging of the airway…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study examining 56 children with DS, the positive predictive value for parental-based diagnoses of OSA was 36.4% (4/11), while the negative predictive value was 45.8% (11/24) [4]. In addition, while the use of in-home sleep studies and overnight pulse oximetry has been rising, especially when there is a lack of or inability to conduct PSG, their accuracy in diagnosing OSA remains questionable [9]. In a review assessing the accuracy of oximetry in 25 published studies involving normal children, oximetry use accurately identified those individuals with moderate to severe OSA [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HSATs have been used in a few other small studies of children with comorbid conditions, but the validity and feasibility of the tests were not the focus of those reports. [25][26][27][28] Finally, our review of the literature identified no validation studies for the use of HSATs in infants and young children (< 2 years old). These populations present unique challenges to diagnostic testing, and the consequences of misdiagnosing or underdiagnosing are potentially more severe.…”
Section: Use Of Hsats In Children With Comorbidities or Very Young Chmentioning
confidence: 98%