2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3823-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is osteoporosis a predictor for future sarcopenia or vice versa? Four-year observations between the second and third ROAD study surveys

Abstract: OP might raise the short-term risk of SP incidence. Therefore, OP would not only increase the risk for osteoporotic fracture but may also increase the risk for SP occurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
127
2
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
127
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Yoshimura et al examined the relationship between osteoporosis (World Health Organization criteria) and sarcopenia (AWGS criteria) based on the results of a survey of bone mineral density in 1099 participants residing locally, and determined that the prevalence of osteoporosis was 24.9%. In addition, although 18.9% of these patients were determined to be complicated by sarcopenia, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 8.2%, and the complication by osteoporosis was reported in 57.3% of these patients . As a result of a survey of 2400 participants investigating the rate of complication by sarcopenia by the degree of bone mineral density carried out by Miyakoshi et al , the prevalence of sarcopenia in the lumbar spine bone mineral density groups (normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic) was 10.4%, 16.8% and 20.4%, respectively.…”
Section: ▸[B] Epidemiology Of Related Disease Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Yoshimura et al examined the relationship between osteoporosis (World Health Organization criteria) and sarcopenia (AWGS criteria) based on the results of a survey of bone mineral density in 1099 participants residing locally, and determined that the prevalence of osteoporosis was 24.9%. In addition, although 18.9% of these patients were determined to be complicated by sarcopenia, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 8.2%, and the complication by osteoporosis was reported in 57.3% of these patients . As a result of a survey of 2400 participants investigating the rate of complication by sarcopenia by the degree of bone mineral density carried out by Miyakoshi et al , the prevalence of sarcopenia in the lumbar spine bone mineral density groups (normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic) was 10.4%, 16.8% and 20.4%, respectively.…”
Section: ▸[B] Epidemiology Of Related Disease Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of sarcopenia in Asia was also reported to be relatively high. However, as a result of a subsequent large‐scale survey targeting Japanese, the prevalence of sarcopenia was found to be between 7.5% ( n = 4811) and 8.2% ( n = 1099) . As such, whether sarcopenia can be particularly prevalent in Asia remains unclear …”
Section: ▸[A] General Population Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations