Is Olympic inspiration associated with fitness and physical activity in English schoolchildren? A repeated cross-sectional comparison before and 18 months after London 2012

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare cardiovascular fitness and physical activity of schoolchildren 18 months after London 2012 according to Olympic ‘inspiration’.DesignA cross-sectional comparison between groups of schoolchildren categorised according to self-reported Olympic inspiration and a repeated cross-sectional comparison using data collected pre-2012.SettingSchools within a 50 km radius of the Olympic Park, Stratford, London.Participants931 students (10.0–15.9-year-olds) attending 6 schools assessed in 2013 and 2014 (18 (range: 14–20) months after London 2012) and 733 students from the same schools assessed in 2008–2009 (42 (range: 38–46) months before London 2012).Primary outcome measuresSelf-reported Olympic inspiration; cardiorespiratory fitness ( mL/kg/min) assessed using the 20 m shuttle-run and self-reported physical activity.Secondary outcomes measuresDifferences in before and after London 2012.Results53% of children reported being inspired to try new sports or activities. Compared with those not inspired by the Games, was higher in boys (d=0.43) and girls (d=0.27), who continued to participate in activities at 18(14–20) months. This 45% of sample was also more physically active (boys, d=0.23; girls, d=0.38) than those not or only briefly inspired to participate in activities (boys, d=0.24; girls, d=0.21). Compared with pre-2012 values, was lower post-2012 in boys (d=0.37) and in girls (d=0.38).ConclusionsHigh levels of inspiration to participate in new activities reported following London 2012 and positive associations with fitness are encouraging. We cannot discount the possibility that inspired participants may have already been fitter and more active pre-2012. These associations must be interpreted in the context of the significant declines in fitness shown by our repeated cross-sectional comparison. Olympic host countries should employ longitudinal monitoring using objectively measured fitness and physical activity to provide evidence of health-related legacy.

Sport Events for Sport Participation: A Scoping Review

“…The limited focus on youth is particularly problematic as many of these claims of increases in sport participation are made about youth populations. Moreover, the majority of studies that include youth populations are conducted in the context of mega or large sport events, such as the London Olympics (e.g., Griffiths and Armour, 2013 ; Mackintosh et al, 2015 ; Darko and Mackintosh, 2016 ; Kohe and Bowen-Jones, 2016 ; Sandercock et al, 2016 ; Such, 2016 ; Kohe, 2017 ) and Vancouver Olympics (e.g., Craig and Bauman, 2014 ; Potwarka and Leatherdale, 2016 ). Of note, Dubnewick et al ( 2018 ) and Silvey et al ( 2018 ) considered the impact of the Indigenous Traditional Games and the Newfoundland and Labrador Winter Games, respectively, on Indigenous youths' sport participation.…”

Understanding demonstration effects among youth sport spectators: cognitive and affective explanations

“…To address this issue, researchers (e.g. Brown et al, 2017;Perks, 2015;Potwarka et al, 2018;Sandercock et al, 2016) have called for investigations that measure intention to participate in sport at multiple times before, during, and after sport events. Responding to these calls, the present study employed a pre-post event research design that measured youths' intention to participate before and after watching a novel sport event in Canada (i.e.…”

Is it time to give population health surveillance a late fitness test?

“…Comparing repeated cross-sectional measurements from English youth revealed paradoxical trends in BMI and fitness between 2009 and 2014. Temporal decreases in BMI were accompanied by declines in fitness over this 5-year period, which included the London 2012 Olympic Games 8. Divergent trends are also apparent in Tomkinson  et al ’s data; they report ‘more-favorable’ national fitness trends in countries where there were increases in children’s BMI values.…”